This is what happens when successive US governments fail to tackle inequality. While millions of people live in poverty, a handful grow unimaginably rich. Wealth begets wealth, and they acquire political power to match. It was inevitable that one of them – now the richest man on Earth – would launch what looks like a bid for world domination…

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It required a failed democracy for him to accumulate that much wealth in the first place. He’s a symptom that has become a cause.

  • Happywop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yes…because WE also have HIM in OUR sights…way more of us. I expect a Indira Gandhi type ending to these billionaires if we’re lucky.

  • raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Revoke his citizenship, deport him to South Africa, seize his companies, refuse all future visa applications.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 days ago

    I liked that in ancient Roman Republic, the rich at least competed with each other by seeing who could provide the best stuff to the poor, like baths, arenas, temples, aqueducts, roadways, etc.

    And if you weren’t helping, you’d be shamed and later on they could just kill you and take your money.

    • IcePeeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago
      Charity is a cold grey loveless thing. If a rich man wants to help the poor, he should pay his taxes gladly, not dole out money at a whim.
      

      Clement Attlee

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is what should be, at this point I’d take the Roman way though. Fucking hell I’d take Carnegie, Vanderbilt, and Rockefeller over the current oligarchs that seemingly want to cull us all

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 days ago

    Considering he’s visibly losing it already, I should think so. I originally thought it was a midlife crisis but it’s been like 4 years.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      it’s been like 4 years.

      I think it’s pretty obviously been more than that: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/03/media/elon-musk-testifies/index.html

      On July 15, 2018, Musk tweeted “pedo guy” in reference to Vernon Unsworth

      For the worlds richest man, and CEO of multiple companies to tweet like that, you’d have to be pretty far gone already.
      Musk has probably “had issues” most of his life, but at this point he obviously lost control publicly, and was unable to contain it.

      Musk is a spoiled brat who thinks his behavior has no consequences to him. This continues to be mostly true, so his behavior gets steadily worse, because he has no shame and no reason to believe he will be held accountable.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The Tesla model S came out in 2012. I just remember that when Musk made that tweet, I’d already identified Musk as a conman.
          But I don’t remember anything in particular that stood out as much before that tweet. Except he had already failed on his promise on FSD, with little to show it was even close. I also remember identifying him as an introvert narcissist. Which is kind of an oxymoron, but nonetheless describes his public social conduct.

          If you are old, do you remember Lee Iacocca (Chrysler)? Or Jack Tramiel (Commodore)?
          Those were stellar businessmen and CEOs, that were geniuses without being narcissistic sociopaths.
          Those were true role models. 😀

    • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      You ever see a dude buy a sports car during a midlife crisis? That shit’s his baby for years. I’ve got a neighbor who’s been waxing his Miata for decades… Keeps it under a tarp and never drives it.

  • Fox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Curtis Yarvin / Peter Thiel “Dark Enlightenment” was overtly anti-democracy and had some dollars behind it, but has been a clown show of an ideology from the start (over 15 years ago) and has only withered more in daylight.

    Whether it’s morally right, there’s a wide canyon between proposing an entire alternative political system, and deplatforming people on X or Starlink.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s like they’re trying to make it the next step from neoliberalism but people are starting to even see the flaws in neo liberalism.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every day I try to remember to be grateful that, even though he’s evil, Elon Musk is also pretty dumb.

    • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      We have had and continue to have a democracy. It may not be the form of democracy you like but no need to pretend otherwise.

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        And at least there’s a statement about a more perfect union in the founding documents. The nation says it has a goal of making things better.

      • BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        We have had and continue to have a democracy. It may not be the form of democracy you like but no need to pretend otherwise.

        • slave owners addressing their “uppity” plantation workers
        • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Free and fair elections, rule of law, stable governmental institutions, individual freedoms, and a free and independent press. Just to give a few academic measures.

          • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Free and fair elections,

            Manipulated by advertising, marketing and propaganda paid by the wealthiest contributors to influence the population. Creating an environment where money and wealth get to decide who gets elected.

            rule of law,

            That can be side stepped, controlled or manipulated by those with wealth and used as a weapon against those with little or no money

            stable governmental institutions,

            That are heavily lobbied, influenced and controlled by those with wealth or corporations and seldom represent the actual will of the people

            individual freedoms,

            Which are constantly challenged or questioned by those with power in an effort to control and manipulate everyone into conforming into inequalitable classes of people.

            and a free and independent press.

            My favorite on this list … free and independent press which are all owned and controlled by the wealthiest billionaires or corporations who allow their media to speak freely as long as they don’t affect their bottom line.

            • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              I strongly agree that all of these are under threat or direct attack in the U.S., if that’s your point. But these are some of the measures by which academics evaluate whether governments are “democratic” nonetheless. The U.S. in particular was much stronger on these measures twenty years ago than it is today.

        • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Let’s just start with not having slavery. And no calling it something else like prison sentences doesn’t change that. Especially when you have States like Alabama practicing chattel slavery

        • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          In the case of America we are a government by popular election and control in its composition through this vote.