420stalin69 [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 7th, 2022

help-circle


  • The qualifier “progressive” is used to describe a liberal who supports progressive social issues.

    Supporting gay rights or feminism etc, that’s being a “progressive” (loosely speaking, it can be defined better than that.)

    You seem to want to insist all liberals are progressive liberals but they aren’t.

    That’s why the qualifiers “classical liberal” or “liberal conservatism” exist.

    In some countries the “Liberal” party are the socially conservative faction of society.

    You’re wrong to conflate liberalism with progressivism. That’s why they’re different words.

    You’re also wrong to imply that progressive stances are “owned” by “liberals”.

    You want to say “progressive liberal” is a tautology…. But it isn’t.



  • 420stalin69 [he/him]@hexbear.nettoLemmy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Isn’t assessing the issue on the issue tracker “listening to input” though?

    Your options are

    • do it yourself and create a pull request
    • make a suggestion to the devs on the issue tracker, who have every right to reject it
    • start a discussion here if you believe a feature is important enough to have public debate

    That seems like a lot of options for listening to input to me.

    What exactly is missing that you want to see? How could you add what you see is missing?












  • None of you NAFOs ever stop to consider the right of self-determination that belongs to the people who live in the eastern provinces.

    It’s pretty clear that the people of Donbas, Crimea, etc, do not want to be ruled by this Ukrainian government.

    A sustainable peace deal would be Ukraine agreeing to not cooperate or be supplied by NATO, agreeing to respect the rights of ethnic minorities, and giving up the provinces that do not want to be part of Ukraine.

    Why is it worth sending tens or hundreds of thousands more to their deaths over that?

    It’s an extremely reasonable peace and this is what they turned down at the start of the war when Boris Johnson derailed the initial peace effort. If the west wasn’t so war-thirsty then this war would have been over in a week, or wouldn’t have happened at all so cut out the pointless rhetoric about “we need to teach Putler a lesson” because you’re being blind to some basic facts about how this war could have and was attempted to be prevented when you recite that mantra.