• 3 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle




  • Glad to hear it boss man.
    However, you’ve got to remember that you’re the boss man. You have to delegate.
    You shouldn’t be clearing spam. You have people for that.
    I spend time doing a bunch of reports to you on pill pushers and spam links. I could just as easily be spending my time banning those usernames, resulting in faster responses and better experience for everyone.
    I think most people on the site would say your time is spent on doing admin stuff. Not mod spam stuff.













  • I can take the entirety of Harry Potter, run it thru chat gpt to ‘rewrite in the style of Lord of the rings’, and rename the characters. Assuming it all works correctly, everything should be reworded. But, I would get deservedly sued into the ground.
    News articles might be a different subject matter, but a blatant rewording of each sentence, line by line, still seems like a valid copyright claim.
    You have to add context or nuance or use multiple sources. Some kind of original thought. You can’t just wholly repackage someone else’s work and profit off of that.


  • I doubt they did the ‘rewrote this text like this’ prompt you state. This would just come out in any trial if it was that simple and would be a giant black mark on the paper for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

    If we rule that out, then it means that gpt had article text in its knowledge base, and nyt was able to get it to copy that text out in its response.
    Even that is problematic. Either gpt does this a lot and usually rewrites it better, or it does that sometimes. Both are copyright offenses.

    Nyt has copyright over its article text, and they didn’t give license to gpt to reproduce it. Even if they had to coax the text out thru lots of prompts and creative trial and error, it still stands that gpt copied text and reproduced it and made money off that act without the agreement of the rights holder.