Which panels are disagreeable and why?
![User banner]()
Samsuma @ Samsuma @lemmy.ml Posts 2Comments 116Joined 4 yr. ago
Samsuma @ Samsuma @lemmy.ml
Posts
2
Comments
116
Joined
4 yr. ago
im guessing the starting point would be 73 opec oil embargo.. So 80s would be the Iranian revolution (oil production nationalization = West big sad), then idk what happened in the 90s (fall of the USSR? Someone else could chime in here). Late 2000s was the Great Recession and of course COVID19 happened after what seems like a time skip.
They need comprador tokens for PR brownie points to convince the libs of the diversity lie too
Ethnically diverse? Motherfucker, they're all kinds of WHITE EUROPEANS. It occupies Palestine with that in mind, using religion to hide behind it and justify it.
The other 30 percent were either kidnapped children from various operations (with the help of the West) that grew up to be dogs of the Euroanglo-zionazis and become Zionazis themselves or straight up opportunist compradors from all around the world. Oh and to top it off, they sterilize them no matter how much they try to be a good dog, because they're not white enough.
That's not diversity, that's a settler-colonial ethnostate playing population control, trying to get just enough brown to justify their occupation to the public, but not too much to maintain Pan-Europa whiteness.
Every fucking time.
And the indigenous reclaiming or reappropriating words and phrases totally never happened in history, ever. "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" is fundamentally different from "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty". Notice how the Euroanglo-Zionazis never utter the former phrase.
Understand that the former phrase is more than just a reappropration to the latter, but a call for the liberation of indigenous land from occupation by settler-colonialists. It's no dogwhistle, and it is very crystal clear what it means: not one inch for Euroanglo-Zionazis.
Likewise, it's very crystal clear what Euroanglo-Zionazis mean with their Lebensraum ass phrase: total wipeout of indigenous land and its people in favor of Euroanglo-Zionazis.
They did try their darndest on Africa actually..... but they haplessly tripped and accidentally hit their head into IMF debt trapping them, their left hand landed straight onto the detonation button for launching NATO bombs directed at certain places, their right hand somehow found itself overthrowing leaders and vassalizing states and destabilizing them, causing perpetual wars to continue to be perpetual, all in the midst of their fall.
Poor them :((((.... sure hope that their successor won't "accidentally" do the same to them.
How'd you come to that conclusion? Are you saying that "From the river to the sea" is distinct from "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free"?
if this post upset you that much that you felt the need to backseat mod, then you're a zionazi, it's that simple.
wait till they find out the motivations that led to the creation of lemmy lol
the left side of the meme:
https://www.elciudadano.com/en/nato-and-its-links-with-nazism/06/23/
not too familiar with the right side tbh
Don't weasel your way out and change the subject.
This is your position and this is what I was addressing:
Trump is a cult that dies with him.
This is your justification to that position:
It’s human nature. People are, in general, not different than their tribal ancestors from 300,000 years ago
You are suggesting that we as humans are hardwired to support the most popular individual and that anything eventful that happens is attributed to that one single individual (this is what Great Man Theory is), simply because as a result of evolution and somehow that's compared to tribes that lived 300,000 years ago, when hunting and gathering and grouping up was a necessity to ensure higher chances of survival. None of the links you provided back up that point, the hill you wish to die on, neither does your justification make any sense. I explained that these links only serve to describe and analyze tribes, not prove the Great Man Theory.
But you know what is a death cult?
Liberalism. Liberalism is a death cult. And you're part of it, engaged in it, succumbed to it and running cheerleader for it, because it serves to benefit you, Trump, Biden, Bernie, Rubio, Team Blue, Team Red, the full works.
Human nature, again, is also not scientifically grounded. Any argument mentioning human nature necessitates an actual scientific study on human nature itself, lucky for you, there's no such a thing. Here's another video explaining why it's a thought-terminating cliche.
I don't take it you're a reading type because obviously you did not read any of the sources you linked, otherwise you'd know that none of these actually say anything about human nature in relation to cults or tribes or whatever, so watch these from start to finish, you'd stand to actually learn something, lib
1st link is about 4 different types of tribe structures
2nd is about leadership and its relation to tribes
3rd link literally runs counter to your initial point about trump cults being a result of human nature, it actually fucking argues that a society is shaped by material conditions but without using the term "material conditions":
By the same logic, "Trump cultists", as you refer to them, do not stray far from your average liberal because it's also within the liberals' human nature to be apathetic towards brown kids, women and unarmed men across the planet to explode into pieces, not because trump supporters and liberals that don't like trump optics have a vested interest in maintaining status quo..
See how ridiculous that sounds?
Nobody fucking argues this way because human nature isn't something that's scientifically grounded, but rather it's a metaphysical expression of our being weaponized by libs like you.
If you're going to roleplay being an intellectual, at least do a better act of reading the stuff that you cite in relation to the points you make, otherwise @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml might bite 👻.
the only thing we could take away from this insight of yours is that it's okay for westoids to balkanize literally everywhere else that isn't in the Global North.
Could you provide an explanation as to how @jackeroni's memes are inaccurate? Which ones?
of course they did, anything so much as hints at providing welfare services that isn't born out of imperialism is a threat to their imperialism... so they needed to make an example out of Libyans by turning it into a sex slave trading hub.
يلعن شكلهم
I had thought and interpreted that the UN or US flag being used in the first panel wouldn't have made a difference but then I remembered someone could absolutely try to diminish the US's (and really the collective West's) role in perpetually balkanizing and destabilizing the Global South by dispersing the blame equally to each member state of the UN (both-sidesing/all-sidesing/whatever-the-fuck-it's-called)..
Thanks for the sources, I've learned a lot more new material from this than I care to admit..