TigrisMorte
- 0 Posts
- 401 Comments
2·5 months agoI’d suggest until you do, don’t talk about politics because you’ve no clue what you are spreading as these are not your ideas but those fed to you. https://www.britannica.com/topic/agitprop ag·it·prop
/ˈajətˌpräp/
noun
noun: agitprop; noun: agit-proppolitical (originally communist) propaganda, especially in art or literature. "agitprop painters"
33·5 months agoTheir theory is that they can replace Human employees with this and thus save money.
“have not had the balls”, you mean Votes. They have not had the Votes.
“watched as a justice appointment was stolen”, again you mean, didn’t have the Votes to do anything to stop it, Senate being in Republican hands and all.You are either an idiot or total agitprop. There is no third alternative.
Library, look it up. And the publishers always hated Libraries.
Only one remaining! Order soon!
Liar. At no point could anything more like “real reform”, regardless of what you mean by the vague term, get passed. You are making excuses and sound far more like you are pushing a narrative than supporting a position.
But perhaps I am too harsh. Please do tell of this “real reform” so we can understand your issue. Be specific and include detailed explanation as to how this thing could have been done at any time in the past four decades.
More likely however, you’re agitprop project apathy third party is a fail.
It is in fact what they are choosing to make more likely by promoting not participating. You go to effort for goals you wish to achieve regardless of what lie you tell and to whom about your intent.
False. I know because I asked OK about Abortion protections.
If you choose not to decide, others shall choose for you. Others as in the Evangelical Nat-Cs, they always Vote.
But do please drone on about your purity and how sullied and corrupt all of us in the real world are.
In the one about derailing threads when you’ve not a leg to stand on.
Only you are not in a position to bale water, and so aren’t, but Biden is, and so is. So not sure your pedantry holds up plus quit trying to derail the thread.
Those words do not mean what you think they mean.
“That’s a joke, I say that’s a joke son” - Foghorn Leghorn
(in case it really did whiz on by; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Tracy_(character) https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/encyclopedia-terms/dick-tracy-watch-_dtwatch.fit_lim.size_640x.jpg
Your calling files, book documents to be specific, books, doesn’t change that IA is storing files, ebooks to be specific, nor that the ruling shall affect all Libraries, which includes the Internet Archive to be specific. And the actual issue, is that the publishers refuse to offer ebooks to Libraries as they assume it’ll cost sales when in fact the folks using the Library are there as they are not going to go buy one.
You are simply wrong from the get go. This is the only way it’ll ever get addressed, is 100% in the stated purpose of the Internet Archive, the dumb part isn’t on the side of preservation efforts, there isn’t a separate issue nor is there a separate copyright the publishers are the same with the exact same unsustainable arguments regardless of web page, code, or ebook.
You are making the same mistake made upon a lot of patents, assuming “but on a computer” is somehow transformative.
Guess he’ll never know then. What are they supposed to be a detective or something?
And just like that you’ve seen one. Now contact the prior dude on his trist welevision and let them know.
75·5 months agoThey are not finished with it yet and the folks backing it are playing so they see the work and are having fun.
and when you realize you’ve paid to watch them go all Uvalde on their asses?