Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
0
Comments
374
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • I mean if you want to get technical, KitKat (4.4 in 2013) introduced verified boot. So from Android 1 to 4.4, it took about 5 years. I believe some form of sandboxing has always existed in Android, but the earliest version I can find online was in Android 5.

    I feel like with the backing of Google, they were able to implement such tight security in their mobile OS without much pushback. Mobile Linux in it current state is entirely hobbyists with very few daily drivers. Unless someone can release some stunning Linux mobile hardware that a lot more enthusiasts buy I don't think we will see any sort of major progression in mobile Linux for some time, as the current method most mobile Linux uses is replacing the bootloader on the phone with an open source implementation which takes a lot of man power to achieve, and it would take even more to make it secure.

    I would absolutely love to be proven wrong about the time frame however. The sooner secure Linux phones hit the market, the better the world will be.

  • or Calyx or iodé or post market or Ubuntu touch or...

  • A hardware switch for software accessing a directory?

  • Since the original user doesn't actually know the answer to the question asked, its because

    Mobile Linux doesn't support any sort of verified boot like android does, leaving it open to evil maid attacks

    Mobile Linux doesn't sandbox applications as well as android, leaving it open to spyware (Think Facebook intercepting Snapchat DMs, not old school steal your credit card spyware)

    and I feel like there's a third major big thing but I can't recall it at the moment. Android's security model is genuinely one of the most secure out of any modern operating system. I'm all for Linux phones, but they need to prioritize parity with Android security before I daily drive one.

  • If you're on Graphene for security, Linux mobile will be the last thing you want as the security of those devices is akin to carrying around a bootloader unlocked android with no app sandboxing. You'd be better off buying a fair phone and using iodé until they can't develop any further.

  • I've used battery share a grand total of 1 time. It was because someone needed an iPhone charger and all I had was USB-C. I'll admit it was a cool party trick, I can't imagine this impacts too too many people though.

  • excuse me bussygyatt, why did you name yourself that

  • I'm not understanding "every 2-3 years" when the article states they're finalizing the Pixel 11s for 2026 and starting on the 12s for 2027.

    also, no flip phones is disappointing but I wasn't looking for a reason to buy a pixel anyway.

  • I don't blame you honestly. I've been on Calyx for roughly 4 years so the break was a big PITA for me. I've been using iodé for the time being and its not bad, but its also not calyx.

    and i agree with you about graphene, theyre a bit too much for my tastes

  • I feel like the Pixel 10 series itself would be fine if they didn't start withholding device trees/binaries. Forcing people onto your hardware because you're the best for custom ROMs is one thing, revoking that access later is an entire other thing that ensures I will not be buying another Pixel for the foreseeable future. Waiting on custom ROMs with locked bootloader for the Fairphone 6 at the moment.

  • iodéOS and CalyxOS are expected to release for the FP6 in the coming months, and if you're currently on a pixel those 2 + Graphene are easily available to you (Calyx is on Hiatus ATM and won't be providing security updates until March 2026 current time of posting)

  • Can custom Roms not prevent this behavior?

  • Is your bootloader unlockable? You could try using a custom ROM with MicroG. Saves you a ton of battery life and gets you OS level vuln. updates. You'll still have chip level vulns. but it'll help the planet out a bit longer than it would if you buy a new phone sooner :p

  • if this was biden fox would be running 24/7 coverage about this communistic act

  • good thing I'm a leftist and not a dem.

    respond "Nobody asked" if you're a fascist

    the edits seem to have won :P

  • thought and prayering so hard rn for this to happen

  • In terms of security alone custom (degoogled) Roms, even lineageos with an unlocked bootloader blows mobile Linux security out of the water. I would love to switch to a Linux phone for daily driving but I can't until they nail down security or lineageos stops existing

  • I've seen local rural conservitards who are anti-data center. its mostly because they're old and don't understand computers but as a self hosting advocate I'm all for it.

  • Its already left our shores with shit like chat control and visa & MasterCard delisting a bunch of LGBTQ+ media.