No, they need to be careful. I keep a personal database of companies that raise prices and have poor customer service.
No, they need to be careful. I keep a personal database of companies that raise prices and have poor customer service.
You can still threaten to cancel. It will be even more effective when the power of cancelling is in your hands instead of theirs, and as easy as one click. Not sure if you were being sarcastic.
Look no further:
They should take away the positives, and negatives from those past meetings, rather then dismissing them entirely. Have something constructive to say or don’t say anything at all.
I don’t see how their defeatist attitude added anything to the discussion, so I had to call them out on it. I don’t have a solution either, but I see the benefit in world leaders getting together to at least have a record of the issues we are facing.
Let’s hear an alternate solution from you, since you won’t be holding your breath about this.
Next do lifted pickup trucks please!
It that enough to cover the cost of their coffin, if they manage to return from putin’s war?
Cool, so like 2 MRI machines?
Everything helps though, pardon my cinicism.
You’re right. I will post this to get you off my nuts. Based on their reporting, it does actually look like earnings are down. Does this account for stock buybacks and all the shady things corporations do these days though? I don’t know. Let’s look at CEO pay while we’re at it.
Yes it does. It’s reasonable to assume profits are soaring as well.
F. your record profits! Pay up! We want record wages!
As if these cultists needed a way to further diminish their listening ability.
A reminder that democracy is constantly under attack and that we should never give up the fight.
Thank you neighbor. You should also know those authoritarian fuckers are doing all that they can to make ballot initiatives illegal or impossible to get through.
“Election fraud” isn’t something they actually believe; they know the election wasn’t stolen. “Election fraud” is a hurdle or stumbling block meant to trap Democrats into trying to reason with someone who isn’t being reasonable. It’s an opportunity to troll people. But most importantly, it’s an empty set of words used as a shield behind which they can commit actual election fraud.
This line of thinking makes me realize that a really good tool for dialogue with these fence-sitters, if we may call them that, would be to reasonably ask them “how has this belief worked out for you?”, in response to some usual garbage conspiracy theory projection.
Of course. What are the chances they’d blame corporate funding of politicians, billionaires, or the oil industry? Or any actual problems? Nope, just continuing business as usual, serving their best interests.
Do they know how to properly pluralize proper nouns?
I’ve got about a thousand of those bad boys on the right! Mint condition, although they’ve been unboxed.