I think you’re taking it the wrong way. I understand it as “anything negative about Biden, is also true about Trump”
- Biden is old, so is Trump
- Biden struggles speaking cohesively, so does Trump
- etc.
I think you’re taking it the wrong way. I understand it as “anything negative about Biden, is also true about Trump”
While it’s amusing that it feeds these Onion articles, it’s also a bit worrying when the search queries are worded in such a way that allows for such stark confirmation biases.
It’s very similar to asking ChatGPT the same question phrased differently and getting entirely different answers.
In my opinion, open world doesn’t mean being able to complete any objective in an arbitrary order.
Progressive growth is one of the most rewarding things in an RPG for me. That means that I have to rethink my path forward until I gain the strength to overcome an obstacle. And that also means that some of my once difficult foes can be a showcase for my experience.
Areas aren’t blocked, they’re turned into goals for me to overcome. Yes, I should have a choice in how I explore the world, but having limits gives you something to break through.
This is my running complaint with most Bethesda RPGs. Just about everything scales by player level, which can put you in situations where enemies are downright impossible to kill if you’re too spec’d into non-combats.
I’ll bite.
I would choose Biden winning.
But… Biden is shipping weapons to Israel?
What’s amusing to me is that they referred to the job interviewer having similar reliability, but didn’t say whether it was good or not. Purely let the bias of the article imply that they were highly reliable.
Is this for real?