Wow. Read this article. The dude is the dumbest hypocrite ever.

These graphs that fan out from the center kinda suck when the difference is so small you can barely tell. It works for the median age of donors, but the rest, no.

The homosexuality part is a poor person problem. You can be rich and gay anywhere.

CRYPTO
/ krip-toh /
[derogatory]

JD is an outhouse of a human being but this sounds like regular parenting shit that occasionally happens. I have a nephew who has definitely needed to be told to shut the hell up occasionally.

sorry what

Liquid Death made an Arnold Palmer called “armless Palmer” but Palmer’s estate threatened to sue, so they renamed it “Dead Billionaire.” I would like it very much if they came up with a petty name on the same level.

Their goal is to abstract people from the hard evidence being wielded against the most egregious environmental offenders. An educated populace is dangerous to the Republican Party.

Why. Not. Both.

People can hold two thoughts in their mind at once. Trump and the implication of his second term is a fucking scourge and an existential threat…

ANDDDDD

Biden is an old man who needs to be sent out to pasture because he can’t keep up anymore.

Jesus Christ why is Lemmy having such a difficult it time with this?!

Dawg,

I implore thee

to take

a chill

pill.

Socialism for me…

Listen, no one doubts Biden has done some good work in this term. But why are you posting this old-ass article when he couldn’t be trusted to navigate a sidewalk today?

^huh!

“They haven’t paid me enough to speak positively.”

If you’re here just to find out what this article says is the “one big reason,” it’s “because old people like their jobs.”

It’s not an easy choice to cut off an interview like this. I’m certain the producers in the control room had to do the calculus on whether to allow her to seed horrible misinformation and “appear” “neutral” (I know, I know), or cut her off and appear to be “suppressing the truth” (AGAIN… I know).

She came onto the show with exactly this intent. It was a win-win for the Trump campaign to pull this kind of bullshit. They’re all so fucking rotten.

Wow. Approval of interracial marriage only reached majority in 1995?

This despicable fuck is aging, and the future can’t come fast enough.

The end of the article is great:

For his part, Mr. Raskin has tried to come up with creative ways to invoke Mr. Trump’s criminal cases without running afoul of the ruling.

During a recent floor speech, he made reference to an “unmentionable American felon, one of 19 million in the country” and an “unrepentant and anonymous convicted felon from New York” without mentioning the former president by name. He referred to Mr. Trump’s hush-money case as “the trial whose very existence must be sent down the Orwellian memory hole to save someone’s hurt feelings.”

In the interview, he noted that no rule could erase the facts of Mr. Trump’s status as a felon.

“I’m afraid the Republicans have now invited a contest for how creative we can be in talking about Donald Trump’s criminal convictions without explicitly stating those words,” Mr. Raskin said.

Is this a Lighthouse reference or am I just too A24-pilled?