Its not truely open source if its non commercial
Its not truely open source if its non commercial
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike is not really open source. It’s more like source available
There is yet hope https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913513693
I learned recently coal is not renewable at all. We will never get more coal. Coal exists from a period of time when trees had cellulose but bacteria had no means of breaking down cellulose.
It takes 20+ hours so since the announcement and now they could have send a command and gotten a response
From what I read they can talk to the CCS (Computer Command System) just fine but the CCS is getting garbled data from the FDS (Flight Data Subsystem)
I meant all bitcoins are useless
No bitcoin is useless, but using it doesn’t cause water waste
Truly a sad day for poppy heads
What’d ya mean you’ve seen it before it’s brand new!
:(
Yes but it makes it significantly easier to guess
Here’s the difference, an artist can make more art. You cannot change your DNA. If someone steals some of your art it’s not the end of the world. You can make more. If someone has your DNA, you can’t change it. Once its out there that’s it. More over having someone’s DNA can give you significant insight into into just the person whose DNA you have but also their parents and their children.
Met him IRL. Super nice, but he’s got a hard edge which might put people off.
Holy shit as a socialist this is the most grounded and respectable take I have ever seen.
Free software is very much like communism, the difference is that cloning something costs nothing, imagine if we could use a ray gun to clone any object, then communism would no longer be even remotely idealistic.