technical and moderation features are factors within the admns’ control. growth isn’t
technical and moderation features are factors within the admns’ control. growth isn’t
lemmy has become much tolerable after i blocked all the meme communities.
i also block hexbear and beehaw for separate reasons.
The problem is - on reddit, the userbase is large enough that I can decide what I want to talk about. If i want to discuss underwater basket weaving, there will be communities talking about that. lemmy is nowhere near big enough - there’s traction on /all/ but not on the smaller communities.
And that’s exactly why lemmy needs to grow its userbase significantly before it can ever become mainstream.
The best term I’ve heard to describe this is “Hapsburg AI”
don’t feed the trolls, just downvote and move on
Are there plans to build some sort of instance-blocking feature?
It’s wild that companies essentially destroyed the practice of overclocking.
A feed with 40 videos, 25 of which I’ve already watched
This is such a problem for me. There needs to be a “remove from the feed because I’ve already watched it, but i’m still interested in this type of content” button.
There’s a difference between a sapient creature drawing inspiration and a glorified autocomplete using copyrighted text to produce sentences which are only cogent due to substantial reliance upon those copyrighted texts.
But the AI is looking at thousands, if not millions of books, articles, comments, etc. That’s what humans do as well - they draw inspiration from a variety of sources. So is sentience the distinguishing criteria for copyright? Only a being capable of original thought can create original work, and therefore anything not capable of original thought cannot create copyrighted work?
Also, irrelevant here but calling LLMs a glorified autocomplete is like calling jet engines a “glorified horse”. Technically true but you’re trivialising it.
lol whats new
I put out some bait last month to get rid of an ant problem I had in my kitchen, I guess I’m as guilty of mass murder as you are
think of the poor kid who you deprived of a balloon, you monster!
And while we’re at it, adding 10million more users would be great too.
But both of these don’t just happen.
This case is very similar to that of James Dresnok - a low-level soldier who had disciplinary and/or life issues sees North Korean as a way to avoid any consequences or punishments for their actions.
It’s likely that his life will play out the same way. He’ll be interrogated by North Korea (but he won’t know much as a footsoldier), then used in propaganda efforts, and work as an actor or English teacher. He’ll be treated better than the average North Korean, which means he’ll get a mediocre but passable life.
Called it. I said this last week when everyone was still hysterical about blocking Meta:
Everyone is talking about defederating preemptively because of XMPP and EEE. But the very fact that we know about EEE means that it’s much less likely to succeed.
Zuck is seeing the metaverse crash and burn and he knows he needs to create the next hot new thing before even the boomers left on facebook get bored with it. Twitter crashing and burning is a perfect business opportunity, but he can’t just copy Twitter - it has to be “Twitter, but better”. So, doing what any exec does, he looks for buzzwords and trends to make his new product more exciting. Hence the fediverse.
From Meta’s standpoint, they don’t need the Fediverse. Meta operates at a vastly different scale. Mastodon took 7 years to reach ~10M users - Threads did that in a day or two. My guess is that Zuck is riding on the Fediverse buzzword. I’m sure whatever integration he builds in future will be limited.
TL;DR below:
Oh man I’m sure my millions of neopoints and painted lupe is gone by now
Once you get enough answers here, you could do a ranked-choice poll on which question is most suitable for a ranked-choice poll too!
Income inequality would be lower in my ideal world. The income distribution should be more like the 50’s. A 4 day work week, and eradication of this “central business district” idea. There can still be offices for some people, but offices can be more geographically dispersed, with different sectors in different areas so half the city isn’t trying to get to one spot in the mornings, or leave that one spot in the evenings.
they explain that in the article :)