Annual on net worth

Putin’s Russia also hosted Olympics

capitalism is a compilation of dick moves

You will still listen to it, watching movies, advertisements, playing video games…

Wikipedia prefers secondary sources, but I think that is not what user Star meant by primary. Just the sources that Wikipedia itself works with.

You don’t simply alter facts, logical reasoning and scientific standards.

Capitalism is reliant on a free market. That does not make it the same nor does that mean that a free market is reliant on capitalism. The concept described above is a free market, not capitalism.

You just described the free market, not capitalism.

Such agreement will probably just be included in future contracts.

An important step to do that is to learn from the past and call out what was right and what was wrong.

They already got rid of it with their previous model years ago.

You’re adding another person to the equation (the player that sells their game) and everyone is supposed to profit? Someone will make a loss compared to the status quo for this to work out and it’s never the marketplace operator.

Hmm, kind of an open source Steam client that shares game files in a secure and verified peer to peer manner and only lets users play that have the corresponding NFT in their connected wallet. Now you’d only need an incentive for someone to develop something better and way more complex than Steam without making anything close to the same profit from it. Also you’d need a reason for publishers to sell their games this way, if after half a year they won’t sell a single copy anymore, as there is always someone that offers their used license cheaper.

Found the pilot of that flight

Touching up your photograph or painting does not make it mine.

if you buy a fairphone maybe you do not buy new devices every year

only micro usb and very slow charging bricks in there

Fairphold

Wagner Bros.

I am not a lawyer but the first question is probably a yes. AI is software and software does and can not hold any rights by itself as of today. The second question is what this post is about and the judge in the article said no, a human or company does not hold copyright over something AI creates. That does not mean, that anything touched by or created with the use of AI is not copyrightable. If you have your movie script error checked or rephrased with an AI tool it’s still your movie script with your orignal ideas in it.