Isn’t new York flooded right now?

Because it’s the country the company is based in.

Can you be more specific? I’d like to know what it’s missing.

Getting over it?

It’s basically a book you can talk to. A book can contain incredibly knowledge, but it’s a preserve artifact of intelligence, not intelligence.

Great way to lose all the best people at your company in a totally uncontrolled manner.

And he’s blaming the anti defamation league…

Shouldn’t that already be covered under revenge porn laws? At least the distribution side of it.

Like many shitty things in the world it appears to be incited by Russians https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/27/burning-of-quran-in-stockholm-funded-by-journalist-with-kremlin-ties-sweden-nato-russia

Calling them psychologists is giving them too much credit, but you’re right that the companies trying to trick them are putting tons of resources into it.

Poor error handling on your client.

Most mushrooms won’t kill you

That’s not very reassuring

That is such a cool launch pad

Even for indexes I do index or something more specific for what it’s indexing. Any simple iteration I just do map or each so the only time I ever need to actually index things is for more complex scenarios in which case it’s worth it to have better names. Also with modem IDEs, auto complete is really good so you don’t need to write a full variable name more than once.

Very true, I put my effort towards trying to reducing my waste rather than gas electric and water. One thing I do think people should change is reducing how much meat they consume though, specifically beef. That produces a lot of bad environmental effects like deforestation and runoff.

That’s the idea. 7 trillion dollars per year is a lot of money and that stuff is where some of it would go.

I’m sure too, it’d just be a funny situation

Lots of Asian fish dishes are served with bones in them. What if he doesn’t know how to eat around them and chokes?

How long would it take us to be carbon neutral if we took all that and put it in green energy?

This ruling seems to be really badly misinterpreted. The case wasn’t for people using ai tools to create works but from a computer scientist who created a completely autonomous tool and was trying to co-copyright the works with the tool. Copyright needs human involvement, how much human involvement is still not hard law, but if you integrate the output of an AI and integrate it into a larger work that is very much covered.