Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
3
Comments
154
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • ...can we please have Skynet instead? Please?

  • Do you know how much chrome spray paint costs?! Do you think that shit's free?! Plus how are you gonna make sure you have enough dog food otherwise?!

  • ... my brain wants to assume it's "seditious," but my heart knows any assumption would be bold when it's about what Trump meant...

  • "Only beer and Coke come in cans, what are you talking about? Have you ever seen anything else come in cans? I haven't! And if you have, that was probably fake news."

  • "It is bonk these here nasty tricks bonk that show bonk the Lib'ruls' bonk true colours! clang"

  • "No, no, no, I like Pringles, Pringles are amazing, Pringles are great. Everybody here at the Oval Office loves Pringles, we can't get enough of'em."

    Edit: on second thought... maybe you're right, Lay's come in bags, doubt those paragons of stupidity ever managed to figure out how the can works...

  • Omg, this guy's the fucking President of the USA... (I do have object permanence, yes, but he's so fucking dumb, that I frequently re-experience the shock)

  • Fuck off, you orange paedo!

  • Holy shit, it's true!😮

    Also, that thing about George Takei, too, yeah. (HOLY SHIT!!)

  • Wait... waaait, wait wait! So you're telling me that isn't an alien?! Well, what do you think it is, a dog?! Hah! Yeah, right! Star Trek would never lie to me! Our relationship is built on Respect, on Trust!

  • Goldie, but very Oldie!:))) Think this one may have existed since before puberty smacked me:-?

  • Real Talk: exercise your throwing arm and use moderately heavy rocks from a safe distance:)) Hornets are NOT happy campers!:))

  • People have called me mysterious before, yes😏

  • Hey, whatever, y'know? At the end of the day, does it even matter?

  • Hell, some of my former coworkers didn't even know I was sentient!

  • I would Capitalism one of these for myself, I swear.

  • I genuinely think it's impossible. I think this would land us into Robocop 2, where they started overloading Murphy's system with thousands of directives (granted, not with the purpose of generating the perfect set of Laws for him) and he just ends up acting like a generic pull-string action figure, becoming "useless" as a conscious being.

    Most certainly impossible when attempted by humans, because we're barely even competent enough to guide ourselves, let alone something else.

  • Yepyep, agreed! I was referring strictly to the Three Laws as a cautionary element.

    Otherwise, I, too, think the point was to show that the only viable way to approach an equivalent or superior consciousness is as at least an equal, not as an inferior.

    And it makes a lot of sense. There's not much stopping a person from doing heinous stuff if a body of laws would be the only thing to stop them. I think socialisation plays a much more relevant role in the development of a conscience, of a moral compass, because empathy (edit: and by this, I don't mean just the emotional bit of empathy, I mean everything which can be considered empathy, be it emotional, rational, or anything in between and around) is a significantly stronger motivator for avoiding doing harm than "because that's the law."

    It's basic child rearing as I see it, if children aren't socialised, there will be a much higher chance that they won't understand why doing something would harm another, they won't see the actual consequences of their actions upon the subject. And if they don't understand that the subject of their actions is a being just like them, with an internal life and feelings, then they wouldn't have a strong enough* reason to not treat the subject as a piece of furniture, or a tool, or any other object one could see around them.

    Edit: to clarify, the distinction I made between equivalent and superior consciousness wasn't in reference to how smart one or the other is, I was referring to the complexity of said consciousness. For instance, I'd perceive anything which reacts to the world around them in a deliberate manner to be somewhat equivalent to me (see dogs, for instance), whereas something which takes in all of the factors mine does, plus some others, would be superior in terms of complexity. I genuinely don't even know what example to offer here, because I can't picture it. Which I think underlines why I'd say such a consciousness is superior.

    I will say, I would now rephrase it as "superior/different" in retrospect.

  • Saw your comment as mine got posted, exactly! Those were cautionary tales, not how-tos! Like, even I, Robot, the Will Smith vehicle, got this point sorta' right (although in a kinda' stupid way), how are tech bros so oblivious of the point?!