The English speaking Wikipedia community is not the ICJ.
The English speaking Wikipedia community is not the ICJ.
I don’t see how your suggestion solves the problem at all… Maybe, that’s a start…
Putin made clear multiple times that we wants the whole Ukraine. Serious question to you: How do we pretend this from happening?
The only way for a stable peace that I can imagine is: The remaining area of Ukraine gets full protection by NATO. Otherwise, Putin will try it again.
Alright, feel free to tell us how to achieve a permanent peace there.
Hint: In 2014, we got a peace agreement in Ukraine and now, we have war. So, what should we do differently this time? How can we make sure that Putler doesn’t just fill up the army for 3 years in a “peace” phase and start the next attack afterwards??
Trump sees that as an advantage… Putin thinks and plans for him for free… All the other people want $$$ for that.
Tiktok reduced the avagerage attention span to 30 seconds…
Politicians plan for 4-5 years until there is the next election…
Humanity is bad at planning further in the future…
Let’s see how the US (I mean… Pennsylvania) votes…
Can’t you just increment the election cycle by 1 year, so that the rest of us don’t have to deal with this shit that often?
Oh, I forget… That requires consensus between two parties that hate each other…
USA is just trying to elect someone how dies before the next election, because he is too old…
Let’s invent cryosleep for those who don’t want to deal with this shit…
This is all a huge war by proxy.
The north koreas will sacrifice all the Russians!!!111
Only in a broken democracy…
The Invidious issues on public instances haven’t gone away in 1-2 months)…
But you can still self host it locally.
Can confirm it. Self-hosting Invidious on my laptop is working.
Nr 2 and 3 of the English version describe a change in the history section and should therefore stay there. Otherwise, you remove relevant information.
IMO, Nr. 2 and 3 are not redundant at all.
I Germany, I hear this often, but it’s also often mentioned that the death numbers reported by them were usually reliable.
Imagine, you are the reason that your own country’s worth went down 75% in 8 years and you are like… “I can fix this… I need more time”
Sad… Did not see the survey when it was running…
“What is your gender?”
82 females, 3300 males…
Ah guys, where are the females?
And the German Wikipedia community sees it differently (differently = waiting for an official decision) and does not allow an article called “Gaza Genozid” until now…
That could also be the argument for calling the article “Genocide accusations” and waiting for the ICJ…
Compared to the previous 2 quotes, this is actually a fact: There are accusations.
PS: Just to make it clear: I am not the ICJ either. And I think, it’s fine to share it as an opinion (“I think, there is a genocide happening”), but referencing it as a fact (“The genocide is getting worse”) before it is actually classified as one by the people who are responsible to do so, is just not useful at all. I know, that especially people from the USA see this differently.