Because the plan all along is generational theft.

Think you’re right lol

Not necessarily “out of sand”. IP is basically putting a price tag on a person for them to say “Yes, I consent”. In other words, technofeudalism.

That’s the point, because otherwise the billionaires will not donate at all.

Socialistic polices get a bad rap because of the cold war-era communist=atheist association. Theoretically, you can reframe vast social safety nets by the government as citizens (read: also Christians) coordinating charity to be distributed more effectively. This is a bottom-up approach that has the common person’s buy-in. The reasonable criticism of the same policies lies in the top-down, legislation by fiat enactment of policy. No different than, let’s say, Netflix arbitrarily raising their prices without your input.

Billions must deer horse

mfw I realize that maybe absurdism is my coping mechanism

Crowd Strike’s Final Fantasy

One’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter.

If you think everything is political…

The hyperbole is the point. They’re explaining that such a thing is theoretically possible.

Alternate source

Looks more like a legislative skill issue than a judicial one to me. I don’t know what is expected of the judges aside from interpreting the law.

Post-revolutionary Tea Time

It’s really funny. Real alpha males don’t care if you wear a rainbow or not.

Drag is the force that acts opposite to the direction of motion. Drag is caused by friction and differences in air pressure.

I’m very wary of the measures that could potentially pass if the some of the anti-AI art people get their way. I know how messy and difficult putting fair-use material in YouTube can be. There would be more of that in more platforms.

I agree unregulated AI is problematic. At the same time, I’m cynical on what the actual measures would look like.

Me when the science teacher says the earth is round /s

JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure

New games with longevity in mind should only use public domain music.