What’s wrong with the name? I like it. Valid points on everything else though.
What’s wrong with the name? I like it. Valid points on everything else though.
Damn, you’re so enlightened.
2013-2014 was when the timeline shifted from being a chronological timeline to a feed. The algo took over and it went to shit.
$1000? I have a hard cap at $600 on principle. Just get a phone one generation old and it’s easy.
Eh, the ones I know are contrarian assholes.
It’s the Costco of health insurance, and given the competition, that’s a good thing. Literal one-stop-shop for healthcare is pretty fucking nice in the world of networks, specialists, referrals, and “coverage”.
But yeah, they fucked up here.
Hah, well time to tell our CEO I’m shutting down our prod servers.
Thank you for putting into words some of the emotions I’ve felt over the last 9 months.
Back when I was on reddit, I subscribed to about 120 subreddits. Starting a couple years ago though, I noticed that my front page really only showed content for 15-20 subreddits at a time and it was heavily weighted towards recent visits and interactions.
For example, if I hadn’t visited r/3DPrinting in a couple weeks, it slowly faded from my front page until it disappeared all together. It was so bad that I ended up writing a browser automation script to visit all 120 of my subreddits at night and click the top link. This ended up giving me a more balanced front page that mixed in all of my subreddits and interests.
My point is these algorithms are fucking toxic. They’re focused 100% on increasing time on page and interaction with zero consideration for side effects. I would love to see social media algorithms required by law to be open source. We have a public interest in knowing how we’re being manipulated.
Or, and hear me out on this, her position truly changed.
I used to think billionaires were cool. Now I think they’re detrimental to society and represent a lot of what’s wrong with wealth inequality in this country. People learn, opinions change - we should welcome that.
No because he’s just parroting a talking point that he’s heard here without even being accurate.
He could at least acknowledge that her position has changed and we’re close to progress.
In what capacity did she put people in jail in Washington state? Let’s follow this thing through to the end.
Tell me more about her history in Washington state, please.
Yeah! Everyone should have to pay full price for their roads or build their own!
So legally speaking, what happens if it was my 8 year old son, who clicks buttons with no regard for human life, that agreed to this BS TOS? How is that legally binding?
For sure. The book’s epilogue talks about the changing crypto landscape and notes Monero. It more or less says that law enforcement is making strong progress on tracking those transactions as well. I don’t know if that’s law enforcement puffing its chest or if it really is and declined to give details.
Eh, even then it’s more traceable than people think. If you’re average Joe, you’re fine. But I wouldn’t want to be a dealer or anything.
This book is good. https://www.amazon.com/Tracers-Dark-Global-Crime-Cryptocurrency/dp/0385548095
AudiobookShelf does more than audiobooks. You can do epubs, etc.
The wording is confusing but they are making more money from the price hike. They were losing money, they are now losing less money.
Streaming Loss Shrinks by $300 Million
I like how the author figured any cord cutting image will do. Ethernet is not the cord the term refers to.