Honestly I don’t see why buying data on the open market is illegal. I think it shouldn’t be legal to sell it but it is. I’d prefer nobody have access than the NSA pretend they don’t see what anyone else can buy.

They’re still claiming they didn’t steal 2000 from Gore

Because it’s not a conspiracy theory - there was an impeachment trial about this.

The fat is still opaque my dude

It’s a great reason until there’s an alternative. As long as voters look to gas prices for their votes, taking action that raises them is politically toxic.

Meanwhile leftists are literally criticizing the Biden administration for high gas prices’ impact on the working class.

You want to change it? Let’s change it. Starting with activists.

Unfortunately we proved just before the midterms that there’s a very linear inverse correlation between gas prices and perceived job performance. Refilling the strategic petroleum reserve is electorally smart. Until activists can detach these electoral relaities nothing will change for anyone.

Or they’re not willing to pay what it takes to bribe the right people to make it go away

I don’t know and I don’t know why you’re being down voted either

IRC

Option 1

They’re basically asking Russia to stop the war and give back all the territory they occupied.

Yes.

But remember, it’s the rest of the world that’s warmongering! Also up is down!

Shitty journey, lucky destination.

France is surprisingly nuclearized despite Total

Surely they don’t only discipline cops when it affects the royals… right?

This is exactly why any carbon tax needs to be redistributed

Please stop posting

One is that nuclear power has to account for and financially compensate its passive radiation emissions. This is unique to nuclear power, even though passive emissions from nuclear plants are less than 10 times lower than radiation emissions from coal power plants. Clearly we don’t care that much about the harmful effects of the radiation emissions, and if we do then coal should be charged for the current and past emissions.

The only reason it takes longer than a few years is because of arbitrary regulatory barriers we’ve placed - so when we say “we should build more nuclear” part of the manifestation of that will be streamlining regulation to make it faster and cheaper.

Alternatively, we make coal, oil, and natural gas subject to the same externality-internalizing regulations and taxes and see how things shake out.

So your issue is actually that there’s a lack of a full commitment to public transmission infrastructure that would allow nuclear power to displace coal, gas, and oil? Sounds like we agree then