Hello everyone! I was thinking about starting a website where to dump some guides on stuff Iearn about selfhosting and general IT stuff.

I don’t want a WordPress or similar. I want static pages (but I’m ok with some JavaScript for navigation maybe, or for proper display on different kind of devices). Ideally I’d like to host it on an AWS S3 bucket since it has the built-in option for static hosting.

I could even go back to the '90s and do it myself from scratch in textedit and html by hand, but I’m pretty sure there are better options out there.

I took a look at Hugo but even that it seems overly complicated for what I need.

Any ideas or suggestions?

Thanks!

  • String@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve been meaning to change my website from Hugo to Zola. It has a few good themes to choose from and it’s easy to set up. Hugo has way more themes though.

    You might want to check out a lot of SSGs to see what themes each has, and pick the one you like the most.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If you use github pages, you can create, deploy, and host static websites for free. Only cost, if you want your own URL, is for a custom DNS name.

    You can use their default Jekyll static rendering engine, and create the content using Markdown. And with github actions, all you need to update the content is create markdown, then push the change to the same repo. After a few minutes, the new content shows up.

    https://pages.github.com/

    Hugo can also be used, but it takes a few extra steps: https://gohugo.io/hosting-and-deployment/hosting-on-github/

    You can also find ‘themes’ to customize the look and feel of the site, specific to the site generation tool.

    If you want a lot of extra features, Docusaurus is pretty much as good as it gets, and you can set it up to push out to GH pages: https://docusaurus.io/docs/deployment

  • thayerw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Lots of great responses here already. In terms of simplicity and ease of maintenance, Hugo is going to be the best solution with its single binary, built-in features, and ease of setup/use.

  • rutrum@lm.paradisus.day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I recently built a site with hugo. Its very easy. You pick a theme, then write some markdown files. And when you need flexibility, you have it for later. I also think it’s the most popular right now, which lends to a lot of themes to pick from and a lot of cpmmunity support.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I use Hugo, it’s not super complicated.

    You basically just define templates in pseudo html for common content (header, nav panel, footer, etc), and then you write your articles in markdown and Hugo combines the two and outputs actual html files.

    You also have a content folder for js, css, and images which get output as is.

    That’s about all there is to it, it’s a pretty minimalist static site generator.

    Hosting wise you can just put it on github pages for free.

    • godber@lemmy.az.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The other advantage of Hugo is that it’s just a single binary executable. Using something like Jekyll means you have to manage a ruby environment over the long term. Which sucks. I’d recommend trying Hugo again and getting past the pain points.

  • Adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hugo can be as simple as installing it, configuring a site with some yaml that points at a really available theme and writing your markdown content.

    It gets admittedly more complex if you’re wanting to write your own theme though.

    But I think this realistically applies to most all static site generators.

  • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Have you considered a wiki instead? I use OtterWiki and I like it a lot. It has version control using Git too.

    There are several dozen different wiki softwares out there, you can compare their features using this site.

    • rsolva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      OtterWiki looks awesome! The combination of markdown, git and a web interface is powerful.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What about Publii?

    WYSIWYG static site generator but personally I like to keep the content in markdown pages in a git repository so i can keep unlimited edit history; this saves everything in a local sqlite database.

    Unfortunately the most powerful one that checks all the boxes, including automatic upload to s3 is hugo, but as you said the learning curve is high. Maybe try to see if you can run the example site of this theme, install hugo in your system, then go in the examplesite directory and run hugo serve. Slowly edit the files until you understand how it works.

  • KaninchenSpeed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I’m currently using Astro for that. You can write the pages in markdown, html or one of the many js frameworks. It also allows you to mix them.

    By default it generates static websites with out any js, but it allows you to add js where needed. Optional server side features are wip, if you decide to need them later on.

    They also have pre made themes on their website if you don’t feel like writing css.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ve been eyeing Pico, but it doesn’t seem to be super well maintained? Do you know if it’s still active?

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    GitHub supports Jekyll page generation. Or at least did this a few years ago.

    And please make sure to also generate an RSS feed for us feed reader users. ;)