That really depends on whose ambulance it is and how, exactly, it’s being used. If it’s specifically assigned to the military for casualty transport then it’s a target. But if it’s a civil service that’s just the closest response after a bombing then congratulations, you’ve committed a war crime by attacking it.
Which is why other militaries go out of their way to make sure they aren’t targeting civil health infrastructure. Versus Israel who seems to be treating it like a target list. Again.
“Threatens medics”
This is also known as a “war crime”
I know it’s an old joke but they really are considering it more of a Geneva Checklist, it seems.
The Geneva Suggestion
Removed by mod
That really depends on whose ambulance it is and how, exactly, it’s being used. If it’s specifically assigned to the military for casualty transport then it’s a target. But if it’s a civil service that’s just the closest response after a bombing then congratulations, you’ve committed a war crime by attacking it.
Which is why other militaries go out of their way to make sure they aren’t targeting civil health infrastructure. Versus Israel who seems to be treating it like a target list. Again.
It’s still about the statement.
During the 2006 war there were documented cases of Hezbollah abusing ambulances for military transport.
Fun fact: 2006 was nearly 20 years ago!
Remember watching 80s movies in the early 00s and thinking how old they seemed? Yeah. Me too.
During this war Israel is strapping civilians to the hoods of their cars while they drive around firing at journalists
What incident are you referring to?
The current ongoing genocide in gaza
If it’s dead and in Vietnam it’s Vietcong, amirite?
Got evidence that this actually happened?
And to be clear, you don’t mean that they were transporting them away. To a hospital.