• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s a pretty strange thing to disagree with. It’s very straightforward logic so it would take quite a bit of evidence to put it in doubt.

    And I have no idea what evidence you’re looking at but I know what evidence you’re not looking at, for example, the rise of Hitler in Germany. As the status quo became worse and worse, more people turned away from the establishment parties and to the far-right (and to the far-left, unfortunately to a lesser extent), which brought about the end of the republic. You can see similar cases in most every fascist state that has ever existed. I would very much like to know which historical examples you are looking at that don’t support my third statement.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Oh, I thought you were talking about people abandoning the status quo for the left. I do not contest that frustrated people flock to fascism. Your strategy is excellent at driving people to fascism, I’ve been saying that from the start.

      Do we not agree that flocking to fascism is bad? In that case yeah, our goals are definitely not aligned.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 minute ago

        That’s a deliberate mischaraterization of my position. There is not a single thing I’ve said anywhere that could possibly be construed into what you said.

        Obviously, people flocking to fascism is bad. But that is what’s going to happen so long as what passes for the left is aligned with the declining status quo.