Is America’s quest for high-speed trains finally picking up steam?::New projects in California, Texas, and Florida are a sign that the United States is finally getting serious about modernizing its commuter railway system.

  • Bilb!@lem.monster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Flying is such a miserable experience from start to finish that I would opt for rail every time if it was viable, even if it took 3-4 times as long.

    • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem today is that it’s an order of magnitude longer. Chicago to LA by airplane is 4 hours. Chicago to LA via Amtrak is about 56 hours. I don’t know that high speed rail is going to fix that problem, sure it might get it down some, but even a 24 hour train is six times longer than flying.

      I say this as someone that takes Amtrak at every opportunity because I enjoy trains and want to see them become viable for more people.

      • GurrenCentauri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re looking at it from a coast to coast perspective when it should really be an intra-state one.

        People aren’t regularly traveling from Chicago to La on a daily basis, even by plane. They are traveling within the same state or to nearby states instead.

        Dallas-Houston, SF-LA, Miami-Orlando are all distances that people have to drive/fly to on a daily basis that could easily be replaced by hsr.