US medical professionals will conduct a formal analysis of presumed remains, the coast guard said.

  • AlexanderTheGreat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In email messages seen by the BBC, Mr Rush had previously dismissed safety worries from one expert, saying he was “tired of industry players who try to use a safety argument to stop innovation”.

    Seems as though he thought he was fighting against the stifling of innovation. In reality it seems he truly was unsafe and definitely should have had better oversight.

        • Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The pressure is why I’m wondering what was survived. I mean, fire pistons are a thing- and that’s a far smaller pressure differential. They were probably flash-steamed before they ever knew what happened.

          • metaStatic@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            the forces involved in an implosion are significantly worse than the average person thinks. if they find anything that isn’t raspberry jam I’ll be very surprised.

        • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just pointing out that perhaps the larger philosophy of broad deregulation maybe isn’t such a great idea

          • XGC75@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            But that’s not the case here.

            There isn’t any regulation of commercial submersibles like there is for ground or air. Anywhere around the world. So the “de” of deregulation is not applicable.

            Should there be regulation? Yeah absolutely, if submersibles are going to be a thing. But that’s just called regulation.

            • keeb420@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              i think they are trying to say this is a perfect example of where things will head if we continue with deregulating industry as republicans think we should. where your boss can say “fuck safety i wanna make more money and if a few people are killed or injured well thats the cost of doing business.”

              • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Bingo. I’ve been to lots of countries with far fewer safety regulations than the US, and can we please stop fetishizing the cheapening of human life and well-being for profit in the US? Please? We came out of that phase in our development for good reasons.

  • Drewsteau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to know what they mean by presumed remains, I thought for sure they would be vaporized when the implosion happened. Like, is this a bone fragment or something? Surely there’s nothing identifiably human right?

    • TheThirdStrike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It meat that has gone through a hull implosion.

      It could be human, it could be half a can of Spam… Would be hard to tell the difference without a DNA test.

          • Nougat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know enough to understand that that should be really funny, but not enough to understand exactly why.

              • Nougat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, that’s what I was plenty aware of. I failed to make the connection between spam (unsolicited email) and SPAM (the Hormel potted meat prduct), which was mentioned in the parent comment.

                I’m just not always on my toes, it seems. I appreciate your apt hint.

                Edit: Oh, I know why I didn’t connect. I was thinking of those as ways to verify a sender’s identity. By that operation, a consequence is that spam is prevented, but I was only focusing on the primary function.