Hey all, I recently left reddit like many of you. I have a question regarding lemmy and the fediverse on the history of banning and defederation. I have noticed several posts calling for varying communities to be disconnected. were these removal requests as prevalent before the mass migration? Usually I am all for communities existsting in their own spaces, barring illegal content. I am hoping that the new users are coming here with the intent to learn how this community works, before we try to remake the community we just left.

    • pizza_rolls@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree 100%

      If you want to tolerate Nazis, bigots, fascists, etc under the guise of “free speech” then this is not the instance for you. And I hope we maintain that moving forward. Y’all can have your own hellhole somewhere else

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A clear-cut and uncontroversial rule that will see little to no opposition, yes.

      And in many cases it’s also clear-cut and uncontroversial whether someone is a fascist or a bigot.

      But in other cases, you’re going to run into trouble. A particular case in point; I don’t like the Disney Star Wars sequel trilogy. I have, in the past, been immediately called a sexist when I’ve mentioned that fact. But I personally don’t care one whit about the gender of the trilogy’s protagonist, I just think they’re bad movies. Maybe there are other people who actually do care and that’s the reason they don’t like those movies. Maybe there are people who don’t believe me when I say I personally don’t care about the gender of the trilogy’s protagonist. So, is https://reddit.com/r/saltierthancrait/ a bigoted community? If there was a Fediverse equivalent, should it be blocked? Different people will argue different ways.

      I can think of lots of other scenarios, I won’t make a big rambling list because I’m sure I’ll step on a landmine eventually. I’m just arguing that seemingly simple straightforward “rules” that are easy to agree with can still end up mired in complexity when people try to implement them in the real world.

      • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “No nazis or bigots” is a nice slogan, but if people turn off our brains and turn off our humanity and just start mindlessly chanting slogans that justify the punishing of our enemies, then there’s no difference between us and the typical German in 1938.

        It doesn’t take a lot to end up in a bad place if we think we’re purely good and in the right and our enemy is purely evil.

          • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you familiar with the Salem witch trials, the werewolf trials in France in the 1500s and 1600s and the Satanic Panic of the late 80s and early 90s? Those people thought they were morally justified in anything they did against the accused because they were fighting against literal Satan.

            World War 2 ended 75 years ago. Virtually everyone who was a Nazi is dead of old age.

            So who are you stomping?

            • Killakomodo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              also funny that you only bring up horseshit things as your dodge with witches, werewolves and Satan, you know all not real, but Nazis and bigots are real so it seem a weird comparison

            • Tyrannosauralisk@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are plenty of white supremacist fascists out there. People often call them nazis because we don’t give a shit about splitting hairs regarding if they are a member of the actual Nazi party or if they’re just closely related scum.

  • CtrlAltDelicious@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eeh let me go against the grain here a bit: Personally I’d rather have my account on somewhere that doesn’t police my access. IMO one of the major boons to the Internet that it being decentralized and not particularly easy to police by any one authority. I’ve lived a big part of my life in an authoritarian country, and censorship gradually builds up. I have no interest in granting this kind of power even governments rarely get to exercise, to some random people.

    I firmly believe that the best kind of content moderation is to use the small “X” button right next to the browser tab. I would understand and completely support not wanting to see certain content, communities or users yourself, but unless illegal [1] I don’t see any reason why you should be able to prevent others.

    [1] even then, question of in what jurisdiction comes to kind

    Anyway, I know that nowadays vouching for information freedom doesn’t win much favours. Cool thing about ActivityPub is that barring future potential scaling issues, I can run my own instance and enjoy the Internet as it once was.

    edit: I have to say that there’s a level of irony in asking for bans and central controls on content on a platform that in its very nature decentralized and supposed to be empowering.

    • wahming@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have to say that there’s a level of irony in asking for bans and central controls on content on a platform that in its very nature decentralized and supposed to be empowering.

      There isn’t any irony. That’s the whole point of the decentralization - it empowers everybody to be part of the communities they wish to be in, and not participate in those they disagree with. We have the power to leave any instance where we disagree with the admins and move to a new one.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am hoping that the new users are coming here with the intent to learn how this community works, before we try to remake the community we just left.

    Yeah go and take a stroll through those instances and you’ll see quickly why their posts aren’t welcomed here.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The reason I am on lemmy.world is that so far, they have basically blocked nothing and that is the experience I’m looking for. I want to be the one who decides what I see.

    That said, others prefer a more curated experience and thus choose other instances. That’s the beauty of the fediverse, you can have both.

  • Spiracle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I prefer individual users being empowered to easily block instances over instances blocking stuff “for” the users in most cases. Issues:

    1. Users from other instances can still require mod actions. Moderation time is limited. Defederating from more problematic instances can be necessary if they cause more trouble than can be easily dealt with.

    2. It is important for instance owners to achieve a coherent “front page” which includes the wider fediverse. I’m unsure if it is possible to ban individual instances from the frontpage while still allowing users to specifically visit them as they want.

    3. Some instances are legally ambiguous or even contain content fully illegal in some countries.


    I did for some research. Basically, all the top-defederated instances on this list are so for good reasons, often even legal reasons: https://fba.ryona.agency/scoreboard?blocked=100

    Note that if you click on an instance, it will show you the various admin reasons for why people defederated.


    The one I saw someone asking to be removed (exploding heads) seemed to be more normal discussion with a big extra dose of edgy humor magazines and swear words. This includes various slurs and straight up racism. This very much falls into the category of “I don’t want those here, but I’d prefer if users can still visit them” for me.

    However, Lemmy.world admins have compiled some issues these users being, including harassing DMs to users. See for yourself: https://kbin.social/m/lemmyworld@lemmy.world/t/107898/Lemmy-world-Admin-Response-to-Defederation-from-Exploding-Heads#comments

    Specifically, admins and community moderators of that instance were the problem. This seems like it would quickly fall into the “unfeasible to moderate on a case-by-case basis” category. Therefore, the nuclear option of defederation may be necessary.

  • BaldProphet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems to be popular to defederate from right-leaning instances. The Fediverse basically started as a far-left stronghold, so it isn’t surprising.

    • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most instances also defederated from lemmygrad (commies) so its not generally politically left either.

      Also there is the problem of liability, if a instance hosts stuff that is legal where their server stands, but isn’t where yours is, you basically need to do it. (Burggit.moe for example, also LemmyNSFW)

      Porn in general is also defederated by many because its problematic to moderate.

      And then there are instances that just brigade a lot or make bots on mass that spam. They usually get blocked as well.

      Last but not least, if your instance defederated nothing it will be defederated because its seen as unmoderated (wich could potentially result in illegal activities)

      • HelixDab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most instances also defederated from lemmygrad (commies) so its not generally politically left either.

        IMO, Stalinists aren’t exactly tolerant either. You’re still talking about a totalitarian and authoritarian viewpoint, even if they’re on the left on economic matters.

        IMO, if your point is to make a community welcoming, then you have to get rid of intolerant voices. That–broadly speaking–means that you have to remove people advocating for any kind of absolutist, authoritarian rules. It’s easy to see at a macro level, but it’s all fuzzy at a micro level.

  • spicy_biscuits@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also have recently left Reddit. And I am all for blocking content that contains hate speech. Allowing fascist content to take root is unacceptable.

  • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am hoping that the new users are coming here with the intent to learn how this community works, before we try to remake the community we just left.

    I counter this part of your post by throwing in there that for me and my time on reddit, the worst parts of the broader experience were the fact that communities of neo-nazis (r/conservative, r/conspiracy), Donald Trump cultists (r/the Donald), incels (numerous subreddits including r/incels and r/theredpill), and pedophiles (r/just18 among other porn based subreddits that were quarantined and banned several years ago) were allowed their own communities on the platform for as long as they were. This gave these horrible ideas time to draw attention and build a userbase that then degraded the quality of reddit across multiple other communities.

    If kbin or lemmyworld immediately start banning or defederating these instances or communities/magazines, then to me that is how this larger community works and it is inherently not former redditors migrating here to shape the Fediverse in the image of reddit.