Valve quietly not publishing games that contain AI generated content if the submitters can’t prove they own the rights to the assets the AI was trained on

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, that’s fine - just as we understand it.

    Your stance against unfettered capitalism is that - if I make some art and aomeone puts it online, some multibillion dollar games house should be able to grab it and use it in their game for free.

    I can feel the capitalists quaking in their boots already. I’m sure the Reddit admins agree with you.

    • effingjoe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      if I make some art and aomeone puts it online, some multibillion dollar games house should be able to grab it and use it in their game for free

      Is that what you think we’re talking about, directly copying artwork? There’s already laws for that, regardless of who or what creates the art. What is concerning people is that AI can be trained on other people’s art and then told to create new art. It’s not a copy, it’s a new thing, but it used old stuff to come up with the new stuff. (humans do this too)

      I’m sure the Reddit admins agree with you.

      I don’t even know what this means.

      Edit: I don’t know if this needs to be said but I am not the original person you replied to.