I see a lot of comments from bootlickers on how the protests are dumb and stupid and dont work and engagement metrics are still holding but the quality of posts and comments has noticeably depreciated imo. So much so that whenever I visit the site Im actually shocked at how bad it is.
We’d need an objective way to measure lameness and then review a large set of posts (on a particular sub?) from a couple of months ago vs now. Criteria have to be pre-determined to avoid the post hoc fallacy.
Average words or characters per comment? Number of insults directed at other commenters (measured by someone blinded to which group they came from)? Number of “controversial” comments judged by large numbers of up and downvoted?
I dunno. I’m not doing it. Not a social scientist. Just suggesting an interesting experiment.
how about a number of crying laughing emoji per thread?
😅😂 OMG this is so accurate 😅😂
This
Hey there JWBananas! If you agree with someone else’s comment, please leave an upvote instead of commenting “THIS”! By upvoting instead, the original comment will be pushed to the top and be more visible to others, which is even better! Thanks! :)
I am a bot! If you have any feedback, please send me a message! More info:
Bad bot
Thank you, JWBananas, for voting on Anti-ThisBot-IB.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.
Even if I don’t reply to your comment, I’m still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!
Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are made of letters.
I have checked 1,599,379,698 comments, and only 302,533 of them were made of letters.
Now I finally know what was missing from Lemmy.