Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoRussia's Losses as of July 4th, 2023lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1212arrow-down123
arrow-up1189arrow-down1imageRussia's Losses as of July 4th, 2023lemmy.dbzer0.comBurstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squaretchotchony@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down9·1 year agoI don’t get it, are those exponentials? But why the +0 then, they could’ve just put 1…
minus-squarek3yword@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou really think those are exponents? An exponent of >700?
minus-squareCatsGoMOW@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThey are not exponents. I believe they indicate the additional numbers lost on July 4.
minus-squareRvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoRussia losing more troops then there are atoms in the known universe would be quite a feat.
I don’t get it, are those exponentials? But why the +0 then, they could’ve just put 1…
You really think those are exponents? An exponent of >700?
They are not exponents. I believe they indicate the additional numbers lost on July 4.
Russia losing more troops then there are atoms in the known universe would be quite a feat.