Sonic says, “Unionization is awesome.”

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/41940

AEGIS-CWA will represent workers across departments including brand marketing, games as service, localization, marketing services, product development operations, product development, sales, quality assurance teams, more, becoming the largest multi-discipline video game union in the United States.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    11·
    1 year ago

    The freedom of association can be restricted by implied or explicit contracts, just like pretty much any other right.

    If I choose to hire someone and they fulfill their job responsibilities, I shouldn’t be able to just fire them because I don’t like something they do that’s unrelated to their job performance. A company should not be forced to retain someone, but there should absolutely be penalties for the employer breaking that employment contract.

    Likewise, I think it’s reasonable to expect an employee to give sufficient notice that they’re leaving an organization unless there’s a reasonable reason for that to be immediate (i.e. if working conditions make continued employment unsafe). Employers can also choose to end employment immediately instead of retain the employee for that period, but they’re need to offer severance that covers the period.

    That sounds reasonable to me. Both the employee and employer have a freedom of association that they willingly restrict through the employment contract, and there ought to be reasonable penalties for breaking that contract.

    • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      Sure. They can sign a contract to those terms. Those terms should not be forced into the contract by the government

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        There should be certain base rights that are protected in any contract. For example, at one extreme, selling yourself into slavery shouldn’t be recognized by the courts.

        Large organizations have more resources to screw over smaller organizations and individuals, so if we’re going to favor one, we should favor the smaller party.

        I’m generally a fan of minimal government interference, but contracts are one area where people can easily get screwed over. I think governments absolutely have a place in arbitrating contract disputes, and part of that is deciding what is and isn’t a valid contract.

        One thing that I think can help is requiring contracts to have a legally binding summary that is easily understandable by the average person. Anything that only exists in fine print would likely be unenforceable unless a reasonable person would expect it to be there. So for employment, the company would need to be upfront about their unionization policy, out it would likely be an unenforceable part of the contract. I don’t know the details of how that could work in practice, but the fact is that many people don’t understand what they’re agreeing to when they sign contracts.