I think I’ve settled on the latter. Disagreement is maybe best communicated by the absence of an upvote? And downvotes work best when they signal something that is just off base, and while not reportable, is not appreciated at a broad cultural level.

    • anteaters@feddit.deEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Good question. I think reporting is left to cases where a post is so bad that a moderator needs to take action to remove it or the user from the community. So downvote things that are of low quality and report things that are against the community or instance rules?

        • anteaters@feddit.deEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          Yes, up/down votes are inherently subjective and reports are to be used for objectively bad content. It is up to the users to decide whether they feel that opinions they don’t agree with are worthy of downvoting or not. In the end the voting system tries to give the community a voice to mirror what content they like to see - within the rules that are enforced by moderators. I think it would be better if people downvote content they don’t like instead of using it to “punish” people they argue with. That’s why I think it is a slight improvement that lemmy shows up and down votes separately - it gives the downvote a bit more gravitas and in consequence “not voting” receives some, too.

            • anteaters@feddit.deEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              Interesting. I have buttons for voting up and down in the web UI and on mobile in voyager. Is that a setting of the home instance?

              I’m not sure what you mean with single function and the separate voting system. Voting on threads vs voting on posts?

    • Zippy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      01·
      1 year ago

      Don’t think the moderators need to action every instance when a person or two thinks something doesn’t belong here. The down vote can take care of that. Moderators can focus on blatant issues.