• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nuclear and renewables are complementary technologies, renewables are a much more volatile source of energy. Also, when people say renewables are cheaper they’re not counting the total lifecycle of things like wndmills and solar panels.

    • HexBroke [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      when people say renewables are cheaper they’re not counting the total lifecycle of things like… solar panels.

      Yeah the LCOE of solar is likely ridiculously low because they still work decades after th started 25 year life used in levelised cost calculations

      Nuclear in the west is so tremendously expensive we may as give up until China makes SMRs cheap

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean China is already making all the solar panels at this point, so we might as well wait for them to role out nuclear globally.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I do think it’s very likely that we’ll see fusion working within our lifetimes. If China manages to get a fusion plant online then that really will solve all the energy problems for the foreseeable future.