• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ironically, in that episode, voting third party was best because both candidates were monsters.

        Today one is a monster and the other is the not a monster but still mostly represents monsters, but some people too.

        • nednobbins@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I took some time to look at who the 2020 Biden voter are who are considering not voting for him.

          While there are a growing number of such groups, one of the biggest is Muslims. They get that Trump is a racist and hates Muslims. They’re also currently watching Biden going out of his way to support Israel in their genocide. To them, Biden doesn’t just represent monsters, he is a monster. They’re logic is essentially, “We’re fucked either way. Let’s get rid of the monster in front of us and then we’ll worry about the next monster.”

          It doesn’t matter if you or I agree with that. They’re not asking for permission to feel that way. If the Democratic leadership doesn’t address those concerns with significantly more empathy than, “don’t be stupid”, the likely outcome is that Biden will miss out on many of those votes.

          Unfortunately Biden has been racking up voter groups that feel betrayed by him. My preference would have been for Biden to find some other Democratic candidate, retire gracefully and strongly back the new candidate.

            • nednobbins@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              What’s the argument that it does?

              Do you think that this disagreement is likely to change anyone’s mind?

              Take a fairly famous example. Bassem Youssef has very publicly embraced the sentiment I’m describing. How does your agreement or disagreement have any impact at all?

              I’d argue that it will only have an impact if you choose an action that’s likely to induce change. He very clearly says that he considers the threats that “If you don’t vote for Biden you’re voting for Trump,” messages to be a form of blackmail.

              He finds it unconvincing so it fails to work on him. As near as I can tell, his attitude is fairly representative of a significant number of voters.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                How does your agreement or disagreement have any impact at all?

                This is a democracy. Potential voters are being influenced right now by the discussions we’re having.

                • nednobbins@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I should clarify then.

                  There is currently some percentage of people who plan to vote for Biden, some that plan to vote for Trump and some who are undecided.

                  Most polling shows that, if there was an election today, Biden would lose pretty badly.

                  If you simply agree or disagree, is that likely to change anyone’s planned voting behavior? If you continue to insult the people who do not currently plan to vote for Biden, do you think that will change their minds?

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    If you continue to insult the people who do not currently plan to vote for Biden, do you think that will change their minds?

                    Yes. People who plan to protest vote are stupid and should feel stupid. We should be peer pressuring the fuck out of them.