• weatherman@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was thinking the same thing, good that he eventually shifted his position but he toed the biden line for months

    • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah it’s crazy how you can’t make even the slightest criticism of a Democrat without getting downvoted and called a bot or fascist. I love Bernie but this is the one thing that really made me sour on him because I had such high expectations of him being one of the first people to come out and condemn the Genocide.

        • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          How is it a talking point from fascist? It took months for Bernie to come out against the genocide… that’s real. Yall are the true fucking fascist. Lining up to vote for Biden is who funding a genocide while acting like your morals are any better than Republicans.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So there are multiple tactics to disrupt a social network; I kind of suspect that the propaganda trolls on Lemmy are shifting their tactics from “Genocide Joe” “I’m not voting” and other stuff that they were getting unanimously yelled at for, and into just posting generally unpleasant stuff that turns people off from participating and drowns out human conversation.

        Just pure hostility can serve this purpose, but it also can draw attention from the mods, so I suspect that a chorus of aggressively wrong stuff like “Bernie isn’t good on Israel and I’m so mad about it” “How dare you disagree with me on that you can’t stand the slightest criticism” and other arguments that are just kind of off-putting because of their blatant wrongness and impossibility to engage with productively, but not technically rule-breaking in any way, are the new tactic.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mhmm, they gave up on Genocide Joe once they remembered they were talking to liberals, and liberals don’t actually care about that unless “socialists” are doing it.

          A lot of them just seem happy to have gotten Lemmy to broadly acknowledge that the genocide is a genocide.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I literally can’t think of a single person I’ve seen on Lemmy who doesn’t care about what’s happening in Palestine or doesn’t think it is a horrifying genocide.

            I have seen a bunch of people say, the point is the genocide under Trump will be much much worse, and our options for this short term are Trump or Biden, so I’m picking Biden. That is an anti-genocide view, not a pro.

            You can say that’s a tactical error and they should withhold support until Biden starts doing better. Sure, that makes sense. Or, you can say a few other things to pick holes in that viewpoint in some other way. Sure, makes sense. But building this fantasy world where there are all these people around who are okay with what’s happening in Palestine is, I think, more or less just a way of assigning cartoonish views to people who don’t agree with you because that’s easier than engaging with what they’re actually saying.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              One might note that the general opinion at the start was very much “both sides” on Lemmy. Until people woke up to the fact that Israel doesn’t seem to think Hamas members and Palestinians are different things.