• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Even if I were to agree with this rather obvious trolling attempt.

    …yes?

    “Type” is a word used to categorize things by shared characteristics, in this context, characteristics shared by the human body?

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        ah yes the Ayurveda, an excellent scientific take on the medical condition of the body, my back aches because my Adam’s apple is haunted.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            you: “is this type of body a body type?”

            me: “yes, a type is a type”

            you: “no, I meant something really specific” (provides a list of lists)

            me: (looking at the list of lists): “this is pure nonsense”

            • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m aware that any of the past attempts to classify body types are extremely pseudo-scientific and I’ve explained as much in a different comment in this thread. The point is that “body type” isn’t just necessarily just a generic way to refer to someone’s body shape. Plenty of people still believe in that made up nonsense.