• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    A sperm isn’t a human. An egg isn’t a human. An embryo isn’t a human.

    I agree with your point but I hate the way you phrased it. The things you mentioned aren’t people, but sperm, eggs, and embryos all belong to a specific species, so if a human sperm, human egg, and human embryo aren’t human, I don’t know what you’d call them to distinguish them from their counterparts from other species.

    • Melkath@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Isn’t a life”?

      But we aren’t talking about cat IVF, so the distinction isn’t needed.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        A human embryo is human regardless of whether we’re talking about other species or not. So is a human corpse. I’ve also seen people say an embryo, egg, etc. isn’t alive, which is patently false; they can die, so they’re alive. Nonhuman beings can’t be people, and nonliving things can’t be people, but being human and being alive aren’t the traits that matter, except as they relate to being a person.

        That’s why I’m suggesting “not a person” is the right language to use, because we’re talking about the concept of personhood, which is what we use to distinguish entities with rights from those without.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m not sure why you felt the need to tell me your command of English is poor, but you do you.