• bobburger@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Disinformation campaigns don’t necessarily need to come up with new rhetoric, they just need to normalize it so that it appears more acceptable to some people. Amplifying and normalizing this sort of thing among certain groups helps to solidify their views and further radicalize them.

    It’s like any other form of advertising, you try to find something that sticks then beat it to death. Then you find something else, and repeat the process. In this case the antisemitic rhetoric is still unfortunately effective.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pointing out these talking points are being artificially amplified by actors whose sole purpose is to damage society is normalizing them?

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Except there is evidence of so-called troll factories in places like St. Petersburg hidden in plain sight in regular buildings where Russians pass off as other nationalities (like Americans and the French) to poison public discourse online. It’s one thing to make stuff up and another to expose what happens where there is undeniable evidence.

        https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-exposes-sick-russian-troll-factory-plaguing-social-media-with-kremlin-propaganda

        • MinekPo1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I feel its worth noting that this article suggests the actions of this group is/was centered on the war happening in Ukraine . I’m not sure what the other person was saying but it does not follow , nor is it reasonable to conclude from this information alone that these agents operate on other topics .

          • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes but to them everything has to be Russias fault even when it’s just what the republican party has been for decades.

            I guess I shouldn’t have thought there was logic in this meme

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well, of course, it’s a huge topic and that’s just one article that supports the idea. I’d need to link to several to cover the bases. I didn’t have time yesterday to write an essay before I headed out. The point of the link wasn’t to back up exactly what I’m saying but to give a rough idea that I’m not just making the whole thing up.

            If you want something more in-depth on the Facebook campaigns that dives into the 2016 election, try An Ugly Truth by Frenkel & Kang. Several chapters are dedicated to how these troll farms were discovered and how they used the platform to reach their audience.

            Still, I invite you to do a basic search on this topic and if you need me to dig up some articles for you I can see what I can find, it’s not that hard to figure it out.

            • MinekPo1@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              my point isn’t to say that the ellection interference in 2016 did not happen , but that I don’t think its reasonable to assert that a topic is being influenced by Russian trolls by virtue of it being something Russia might have a vague interest in .

              not to say that any suspicions are invalid , of course , but again from what I understand , Russia has a very “one topic at a time” approach , which should be taken to mean there is a limited number of affected communities , which from past examples appear “home grown” .

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                “vague interest”? I think you’re severely downplaying their intentions for whatever reason. Russia has plenty to gain from the destabilization of the West.

                Russia has a very “one topic at a time” approach

                What do you base this on? And why would this impede them from trying? You make it sound like this lies in the hands of a handful of people or that it’s not a sizeable operation. And can you give “homegrown” examples that can be shown not to be influenced by Russian disinformants?

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            How is this the same thing? lol I literally linked you to an official website about this very thing being uncovered. I don’t even know how to respond to you because you make no sense.

          • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Do you have a condition that makes you incapable of putting together a logically coherent response or are you being intentionally obtuse?