• Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think you forgot what I said, and what you replied with had absolutely no bearing on any point that I made or the link I included.

    No, I replied to what you said with my points. And the whole “Hey bro, I deleted my post, can you tell me what it said?” is creeping very very close to trolling territory.

    I read your reply. I responded. You can choose to accept it or not.

    Just because I may have not broke it down point by point, doesn’t invalidate what I am saying. But playing weird “post then delete and say 'gotcha!” is weird.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, I replied to what you said with my points.

      You didn’t, though. I said that there are quite a few Democrats who are supporting ranked choice voting, I.e. the effective form of the exact reform to the voting system that is the genuine solution to the duopoly. And that having the Democrats split the vote with a third party and lose isn’t any kind of step towards reform of anything, and that to accuse the Democrats of blocking reform because they don’t want that to happen, when the actual reform is something they are making happen, is silly.

      Then you sent me back a big message all about what a travesty it is that the Democrats are blocking reform.

      I get it if you feel like the method I chose to use to address that was a little convoluted and condescending. I mean, it was. But surely you can see how I could get a little startled on my side by the discontinuity and want to address and highlight it. No?