Gross. But you’re right, denying it just prolonged the news cycle, and creates an incentive for someone to prove it. The guy used to visit a store to masturbate, there’s no chance he was careful enough to avoid creating some evidence. He should just ignore the story and try to move passed it.
He better be careful. There may be a crusty old mop sitting in a closet with his DNA on it still.
Gross. But you’re right, denying it just prolonged the news cycle, and creates an incentive for someone to prove it. The guy used to visit a store to masturbate, there’s no chance he was careful enough to avoid creating some evidence. He should just ignore the story and try to move passed it.