Yep, the headline sucks.
Yep, the headline sucks.
While I agree with you, the video is worth watching, it’s about voting systems.
I’m the one getting snippy? Hahaha okay.
I read the article, I’m just commenting about the world around the article from a small step back, and I tried to help you see that.
Have a nice day.
Well I tried to show you what’s happening, I’m sorry you’re not seeing it, but I’m done. Have a nice day.
Maybe you’re missing the connection here.
Facebook is implementing features to prevent some types of advertising, as per the article.
Facebook allows the purchase of the exact same advertising, so long as you pay their fee.
It’s just a different flavour of the same shit.
These days I have to create a spam filter for my phone notifications, let alone emails.
WhatsApp is owned by Facebook and you can pay them for corporate accounts and advertising.
How dare they advertise without giving WhatsApp (aka Facebook) a cut of the profits!
I just visited Graceland, the number of black folks that wanted to vote for trump was terrifying.
They had some really valid complaints about the Democrats, but they had no idea of what trump was, they just knew that the democrats weren’t solving their problems.
No, I think it’s the opposite……
Which part of trumps agenda is hidden? I mean he puts it ALL on display and his supporters don’t give a fuck.
I would bet that there’s nothing there because everyone already knows, and people have already decided whether they give a shit or not
And that’s terrifying
I always give “companyname@personaldomain.com”
That way datasets are harder to correlate and I know who leaked 😝
You don’t get to being the CEO of a large company without being an asshole of one type or another, and outrage drives views and clicks.
Soooo…. You get what you incentivise.
I didn’t say great, just “has more than one redeeming quality”
I’m very aware of the Facebook shit list, that’s why I’m so shocked.
As a user, and great fan of the llama models….
I did not have “Zuckerberg saves us from ai” on my bingo card.
…… nor did I have “musk threatens and then pussies out from fighting Zuckerberg”
Or even “Zuckerberg becomes less despised as an individual”
Like…… have I switched timelines and universes?
Ehhhhh Queen Elizabeth II was plenty leader enough for them, but you might not be wrong.
The international community may not get a vote, but you also have to keep “how will he be perceived with other world leaders” in mind.
But I think you’re right, she kinda needs a straight white man to appeal to the broader audience
Hopefully you’re right and she picks him?
I don’t know. Even the homophobia within the USA is problematic to her.
Buttigieg being gay is unfortunately a huge strike against him because in the international community, the acceptance of gay folk is still not there. Many countries still have some very strict laws against being gay and that complicates things.
But man, that guy is a wolf. Watching him deal with hecklers or just debating someone, he’s just a straight up shark. He can smell the blood and wreck someone in one bite.
Now do tucker