Whats it called when an organization murders random people with the hope of scaring the public into not helping a different group?
Whats it called when an organization murders random people with the hope of scaring the public into not helping a different group?
Currently it’s just a Lemmy client. It’ll be cool to watch the development, but at present I don’t see how it’s any better than voyager. At least on mobile the interface has a lot more dead space than voyager.
How fucking smug. If only we were all as brave as you.
Not usually, no. They usually just want to live somewhere else.
Literally Jorjor Well
So from this graph we can say that with all the government help they receive pensioners are about as poor as working people without kids. And that’s bad. Pensioners should be poorer than working people
Pensioners have it too good? Is that the line here?
Gotcha. Thanks for the explanation!
If he has now got supreme power couldn’t he just declare that the president doesn’t have supreme power, and hey presto it’s gone?
“The new book has, for lack of a better term, completely screwed over my fanfiction”
“These books live and die by their fanfiction. For the authors not to coordinate with the fanfic writers is a disgrace”
What are hoops that you chase with a stick doing to children? Demands grow to restrict kids access to hoops that you chase with a stick
Expansionist?
Shadow boxing
" Several of the researchers are associated with public security authorities in China, a fact that “voids any notion of free informed consent”, said Yves Moreau, a professor of engineering at the University of Leuven, in Belgium, who focuses on DNA analysis. Moreau first raised concerns about the papers with Hart, MGGM’s editor-in-chief, in March 2021.
One retracted paper studies the DNA of Tibetans in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, using blood samples collected from 120 individuals. The article stated that “all individuals provided written informed consent” and that work was approved by the Fudan University ethics committee.
But the retraction notice published on Monday stated that an ethical review “uncovered inconsistencies between the consent documentation and the research reported; the documentation was not sufficiently detailed to resolve the concerns raised”. "
Weird. So they had written consent forms for the blood samples, but the forms weren’t detailed enough(?), and anyway you can’t trust anyone associated with the Chinese gvmt? Is that what they’re saying?
This seems like weird reactionary virtue signalling.
Do you always talk down to people?
Reactionary bullshit
Attention doesn’t pay 180k tho
You. I’m asking you.