Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)J
Posts
0
Comments
19
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • Its pretty easy to score points when the government is doing everything it can to become unpopular.

  • Isn't the campaign just titanfall 2?

  • Sounds like Valve should set up a payment processing system.

  • I enjoy watching videos of Nancy maced

  • Oh man, how good would it have been if Lex Luthor was the one claiming he was fighting for truth, justice and the American way in the latest film.

    (Apologies if he does, I've not seen it yet, just the outraged responses.)

  • Is that a number 7?

  • So 211 of them all admit it exists, at least. Good first thing to pin to them, and ask why their lord and savior thinks it doesn't exist.

    "Do we think its part of his mental decline or his unwillingness to have his name read out?"

    Also, just to edit myself and add a little something:

    "If you feed a terrorist or fund a terrorist, you're a terrorist." - your enigmatic W. Bush.

  • Excuse my life, but what the fuck is a Catholic hospital?

    "Welcome good sirs to my church of the Bristol Stool Chart!"

  • The cultural relief felt when thatcher died was palpable, and I wasn't even alive when she was actively fucking the country.

  • Sycamore Gap?

  • Come now. When people say strawmanning, they tend to mean that someone has taken the time to at least turn a pile of straw into the shape of a man but you can't even be arsed to do that. Just standing next to it and calling it a man is even sadder.

    You started too many chats and feel like you need to argue them all but you can't even remember who said what.

    "Anyone not fighting my corner is for the murder of innocents" Sounds a bit brain-rotty, fella. A tad corrupt.

  • Saying that killing is morally wrong, or saying that an individual is hateful, is a nothing sentence. It's not an opening of discourse or planet brained insight. When asked a follow up, to elucidate, you assume the position of actors and extol your own virtue by putting down the rest.

    It's nout but antagonism for the purpose of whysoever a troll would do anything. Getting jollies off by calling high horse, or moral corruption.

    You make playing in the shit look like fun, and then feign upset when others join you.

  • Ahhhh, I get it. No instances of me cheering at the death of others, so the other party has to fake the argument. Petty, and a pity.

    Come now, you've started discourse with others, you really ought to answer their questions.

  • Your ability to admit you don't understand it is a big step. Now you just need to address your previous commenters in the same light, with the questions you've been asked and are too afraid to answer. We believe in you, champ.

  • Jesus, those are some thoroughly piss-soaked chips you've got there, petal.

  • I just want to hear someone from the press pool shout, "you've already said this, Donald."

  • Not at all.

    I only remember because I recently watched that Ordinary Things video about him.

  • It was Milan. Though I'm sure the people of Rome were more than welcome to go see his bespatted husk.