MinekPo1 [She/Her]

nya !!! :3333 gay uwu

I’m in a bad place rn so if I’m getting into an argument please tell me to disconnect for a bit as I dont deal with shit like that well :3

  • 1 Post
  • 40 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • sharing comment by @daigakunobaku273

    Lterally citing Sergey Sumlenniy as “Eastern Europe expert”

    LOL That’s basically all you need to know about the level of “expertise” that went into creating this video.

    Since, for some reason, my comment is not yet deleted by the moderators, and somebody appears to have actually read it, I might as well point to the actual factual mistakes and problems with the video.

    1. These books are not, to the best of my knowledge (and I tried hard to find any evidence supporting the author’s claim) created, or approved, or distributed, or sponsored by any Russian state agency. They belong to a subgenre of male fantasy fulfillment books which target a specific audience of poorly educated lower middle to lower class males, typically 40+ years old, nostalgic of the Soviet Union (or, rather, of their rose-tinted pseudo-memory thereof).

    There are thousands of other “military fiction” books targeting pretty much the same audience, but not having anything to do with “popadantsi”, including tons of S.T.A.L.K.E.R. fanfics (yes, S.T.A.L.K.E.R. fanfics sell as actual books in Russia, and in a typical book store you’ll find an entire section dedicated to them and to S.T.A.L.K.E.R. epigones, right next to the section dedicated to “popadantsi” literature, that is, if there even is such section. Most of the “popadantsi” books are actually self-published in electronic format, they are not nearly as popular as the author of the video portrays them to be. The other “military fiction” stuff sells much better).

    You don’t need “government sponsorship hypothesis” in order to explain the existence of these books. They have their fanbase. That is not to say that the state propaganda has nothing to do with their popularity. The propaganda just exploits the same ressentiment and the same need to compensate for misfortune in one’s life by creating a fantasy world. People who enjoy these books are exactly the same people who sincerely believe the stuff translated by the Russian state TV. That does not mean the books are sponsored by the government.

    1. Outside of this relatively small, but substantial and loyal fanbase, the entirety of the Russian society laughs at these books, even the chauvinists and the Putin supporters. These books are a long-running meme in the Russian internet; the author didn’t even find or show the truly deranged and legendary stuff, like “The Popadanets Bee” (the actual title of an actual book; it tells the story of a Russian soldier, “heroically dying on Donbass in 2014”, whose mind is being transferred by the Higher Beings into the body of a bee living in the Emperor’s Garden of WWII Japan. The same book features Soviet pagan communist soldiers worshiping Svarog).

    As was said before, most of these books don’t exist outside the Internet; the pool of their authors is relatively small and consists mostly of graphomaniacs, “publsihing” dozens of books each. The author, however, portrays them as a massive influence on the beliefs of Russians (They are not. The state media are. These books are a minor symptom.)

    1. Sergey Sumlenniy, whom the author unironically presents as an “Eastern Europe expert” (this phrase alone is a meme in the Russian opposition Twitter) is a Russian journalist and political “expert”, previously working for the Russian pro-Kremlin (and Kremlin-backed) magazine “Эксперт”. Later he worked as an expert that helped the Western companies working in Russia to evade the sanctions imposed on Russia after 2014 (I don’t want to go to jail for reminding you what happened this year).

    At the time he gave interviews about his job to Russian federal media. This whole time, from 2014 to 2022, he mostly lived in Berlin off the money he earned by working for a pro-Kremlin magazine and by helping Western companies circumventing sanctions imposed on Russia. He never publically said as much as a word in protest to the Russian policies.

    In February 2022 Sumlenniy has suddenly discovered that he is, in fact, a German, and that every single Russian, even the opposition leaders (especially the opposition leaders!) is guilty of Russia invading Ukraine (oh, sorry, I meant, protecting the people of Donbass and fighting nazism). Russians are “much more guilty than Germans in WWII” (direct quote), because any Russian who does not support the war could simply emigrate. The fact that they didn’t simply indicates, per Sumlenniy, that all Russians are brainwashed orcs, and opposition leaders are even worse than Putin, because Navalny is a neo-nazi and had slurred Ukraininans and Georgians, and everyone else is even uglier. But he, Sumlenniy, he is not responsible for the war. He is a German now, remember? (“We, germans” has also become a meme in the Russian emigrant Twitter.)





  • to be fair , neither the free software movement nor the open source movement (which are distinct ideologically) are explicitly socialist . in a way , especially the free software movement , they embody an extention of liberalism .

    both of these movements focus on the individuals freedom and take issue not with developers/companies being systemically incentivized to develop closed source / nonfree software , but with individual developers/companies doing so . thus the solution taken is limited to the individual not to systemic change .



  • autistic complaining about units

    ok so like I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a more confusing use of units . at least you haven’t used the p infix instead of the / in bandwith units .

    like you used both upper case and lowercase in units but like I can’t say if it was intentional or not ? especially as the letter that is uppercased should be uppercased ?

    anyway

    1Mb

    is theoretically correct but you likely ment either one megabyte (1 MB) or one megibyte (MiB) rather than one megabit (1 Mb)

    ~325mb/s

    95mb/s

    and

    9mb/s

    I will presume you did not intend to write ~325 milibits per second , but ~325 megabits per seconds , though if you have used the 333 333 request count as in the segment you quoted , though to be fair op also made a mistake I think , the number they gave should be 3 exabits per second (3 Eb/s) or 380 terabytes per seconds (TB/s) , but that’s because they calculated the number of requests you can make from a 1 gigabit (which is what I assume they ment by gbit) wrong , forgetting to account that a byte is 8 bits , you can only make 416 666 of 4 kB (sorry I’m not checking what would happen if they ment kibibytes sorry I underestimated how demanding this would be but I’m to deep in it now so I’m gonna take that cop-out) requests a second , giving 380 terabits per second (380 Tb/s) or 3.04 terabytes per second (3.04 TB/s) , assuming the entire packet is exactly 114 megabytes (114 MB) which is about 108.7 megibytes (108.7 MiB) . so anyway

    packet size theoretical bandwidth
    1 Mb 416.7 Gb/s 52.1 GB/s
    1 MB 3.3 Tb/s 416.7 GB/s
    1 MiB 3.3 Tb/s 416.7 GB/s
    300 kb 125.0 Gb/s 15.6 GB/s
    300 kB 1000.0 Gb/s 125.0 GB/s
    300 kiB 1000.0 Gb/s 125.0 GB/s
    30 kb 12.5 Gb/s 1.6 GB/s
    30 kB 100.0 Gb/s 12.5 GB/s
    30 kiB 100.0 Gb/s 12.5 GB/s

    hope that table is ok and all cause im in a rush yeah bye







  • autistic complaining

    honestly I don’t even know how to interpret ~11.5 μg b/s (micro gram bits per second).

    Seriously I get not liking capital letters , but like ESPECIALLY in this case (as ~11.5 b/s and ~11.5 B/s are about as reasonable) , capitalize your units ! also differentiate between GiB (gigi bits) and GB (giga bits).

    to be fair , because g and b are not separated by a space , “×” or “•” , g should be interpreted as a prefix , according to SI rules , but its not something most people know about and g is not a valid SI prefix .







  • I’m not attempting to argue communism is not bad in my comment, I believe this is even more true if you believe communism is bad.

    I am strictly saying comparing Nazism and communism does not give a full picture, which is, AFAIK, something that experts in Soviet history, some of which I quoted, agree with.

    What I’m trying to say is that comparing the two you risk either reducing the weight of crimes committed by Nazis, which are worse than those committed in any communist state, I hope you’ll agree and also risk loosing the detail distinguishing the two.

    I would elaborate further, but I want to make this comment shorter to make what I’m saying a bit more accessible.


  • I don’t think comparing communism with fasism, at least when it comes to exterminating ethnic minorities is accurate. this is an opinion shared by academics, including coauthors of “The Black Book of Communism” (the book which claims communism killed 80M-100M people, though the upper end of the range is the one which has more attention. this number is disputed, again also by coauthors)

    I could explain why I believe you shouldn’t do this in my own words, but I will use the words of Nicolas Werth, one of the three main coauthors who distanced themselves from the book:

    Death camps did not exist in the Soviet Union.

    and

    The more you compare Communism and Nazism, the more the differences are obvious.

    Another quote I will give is from Amir Weiner an American historian and associate professor of Soviet history at Stanford University who wrote:

    [w]hen Stalin’s successors opened the gates of the Gulag, they allowed 3 million inmates to return home. When the Allies liberated the Nazi death camps, they found thousands of human skeletons barely alive awaiting what they knew to be inevitable execution.

    I sourced these quotes from Wikipedia: “The Black Book of Communism”, references 19 and 14.

    My point isn’t to say the Soviet Union, or other states which had or have Marxist-Leninist governments are without critique, but that comparing them to the III Reich, at the very least diminishes the crimes committed by Nazis and makes analysis of the aforementioned States more muddy.