Tbh, I stopped caring about Stackoverflow. I never even dared to ask a question ever since I’ve gotten more used to working in programming and have just been using it like reddit as the top search result
Tbh, I stopped caring about Stackoverflow. I never even dared to ask a question ever since I’ve gotten more used to working in programming and have just been using it like reddit as the top search result
It kind of did though. California HSR isn’t doing very hot in the court of public opinion last time I heard about it
I was so confused by that title. Thank you for clarifying!
Yeah Revolut has single use credit cards which is useful
I’m sorry but this is borderline stupid food for me.
That’s some bare metal system breakage I can get behind
Sorry, I might have confused you there. I was giving an example for a sub-plot that, afaik doesn’t exist in BG3. Having to reload is probably not what OP was looking for
Did you raid the grove?
Also I think what they meant is, that on a total-party-kill instead of having to reload a save, the game continues with a path to resurrection sub-plot or something like that.
I am not sure if it qualifies but Paradise Killer is pretty unique all-around. It may seem walking-simulator-ish but the presentation and the overall game-design are definitely a stand out. You’re trying to solve a murder mystery and it’s completely up to you as the player to decide when you’ve gathered enough information to make a conviction. There is practically no hand-holding either which is quite rare for a mystery solving/detective game. I know it might not exactly be what OP asked for but I think the game is worth being recommended more.
In Mozilla’s “Privacy not included” report, Mazda isn’t listed as one of the 25 car brands they tested.
Their related article goes on to state, that all of the 25 brands they tested earned the Label, which I take to mean, that by extension probably most if not every car brand has privacy flaws.
Care to elaborate? I can’t make sense of your response
Yes because online discussions usually aren’t inherently subjective and instead backed by sourceable knowledge. Sorry for the cynicism but one could always find any source that underlines any point so everything should be taken with a grain of salt.
I’d personally argue, that the way generative AI works lends itself to produce answers that fit the general consensus of the internet that is relevant to the given prompt, because it calculates the most likely response based on the information available. Since most information relevant to “Google Web DRM” is critical of it (Google doesn’t call it DRM themselves), it makes sense a prompt querying the AI for opinions on Web DRM will result in a rather negative response, if Google doesn’t tamper with it to their advantage.
This is so fucked up… Probably not even the worst example of political repression in the current day either
Agreed. Like the original linear Mirror’s Edge is way better than it’s open world prequel. It’s my go-to example for exactly this problem.
I’m going to miss Tom