Yep, Google did buy recaptcha after all

Virtual keyboard support

Where in the article does it say she broke their dress code? Do you have a source?

fyi it’s “moot point”, not “mute point”

From what they’ve said the game can run fine, but the issue is getting local split screen on the S working because it has such a small amount of RAM available

I read Hi-Rez in the title and was briefly hopeful for Tribes news. Nope

What game is this?

This reads very much like a tech bro wrote it

The writer assumes the reader is a man also. They use he and they to refer to programmers, but never she. The only time she is used in this entire document is referring to a woman delivering your code:

The outcome you should be thinking of is a lady who’s going to get fired if she doesn’t deliver the output of your program at 4:59pm sharp.

Hopefully they do both, but I agree

And get an air purifier if you have the means

You got me clicking countries on the map now. I really can’t find a consistent reason why sometimes it shows the outline and sometimes it doesn’t…

• Canada: yes
• Russia: no
• South Korea: no
• China: no
• Spain: no
• France: yes
• Iraq: yes
• Kyrgyzstan: no
• Mongolia: yes
• Japan: no
• USA: yes
• Malaysia: yes

What pattern is there here???

Go the JavaScript route. React is the most popular front end technology rn, and Node is also really common. You’ll have the best chance at either contributing to projects, or getting a job this way

It’s not a new game, but Chibi robo is entirely this concept

After playing RDR2 I found myself wanting to shoot at birds flying overhead irl to make more arrows

I use this one and it works perfectly fine. No interruptions

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/twitch_5/

It’s written in Kotlin, not Java fyi

Yeah, that’s totally fair to question. I mentioned above, but it depends on sample selection and study design moreso than the actual number 👍

Yes, I’m aware. Sample sizes to get a 95% confidence interval are significantly smaller in most cases than the average person thinks. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination and the section on required sample size for hypotheses tests. There’s even sample size calculators online you can find that’ll spit this number for a 95% CI out for you. Personally I think given that information, it’s pretty unlikely the author made that error in a peer reviewed paper where reviewers are certainly aware as well

1000 is not small at all and with a properly designed study it’s more than enough for statistical significance

I still have mine! Found it the other day