Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Wigners_friend @ Wigners_friend @piefed.social
Posts
0
Comments
11
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • Untestable universes is not a rejoinder to "stop thinking" it's just another way to achieve it

  • US and Russia ‘propose West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine’

    Jump

  • The onion has to be funny, not just dumb. It isn't the Babylon bee.

  • US and Russia ‘propose West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine’

    Jump

  • I literally had an Israel defender on reddit agree that black people under apartheid should have accepted it for "peace". I live in south Africa, fuck Nazis, even the Jewish ones.

    Irony: Jewish people in SA were a big part of anti-apartheid efforts; all the while Israel was apartheid's biggest mate (after Thatcher and Reagan got cold feet of course, don't feel too righteous in the anglosphere).

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • The "solutions" are not out of reach. Just do the experiment more than once, like any statistical theory.

    The moon thing: yes because it was hard to get to, not impossible in principle. If the moon was in a parallel universe your analogy wouldn't be irrelevant.

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • "It's not as pop-sci as painted" anyway here's some pop-sci to justify it....

    The reply to the energy problem is hilarious. These universes that differ by a single quantum event have radically different energy totals. Science!

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • Great answer, but it unfortunately is taken seriously. The reason is because it is an "end of the road" hypothesis. It tells you all the weirdness is fundamental and no further thought is required. Just like good old Copenhagen. The unfalsifiability is a virtue here, it's a complete explanatin without the messy testing. Now stop thinking, shut up, and calculate.

  • What proof is there of the multiverse?

    Jump

  • If we sufficiently torture the word "simplest".

  • Can an electron-positron pair become entangled? And since the positron behaves as if moving backwards through time, are these particles entangled as if at different points in time?

    Jump

  • It's stronger than a classical one, yes. But Einstein's description is mocking the idea of entanglement as an active link that allows distant states to be changed by local actions.

  • A game, or series of, you believe belongs in a museum?

    Jump

  • Deus ex human revolution: explores a meta narrative of how you use power in computer games. Your character has incredible capability. You could obliterate every enemy with ease. It's a completely different game if you try to avoid killing those who are just getting by (sure a security guard will shoot you, but they are expecting lethal terrorists). You use the power you have to avoid killing, not to make it easy.

  • Can an electron-positron pair become entangled? And since the positron behaves as if moving backwards through time, are these particles entangled as if at different points in time?

    Jump

  • Positrons don't move backwards in time in any physical sense. Their mathematical representation is like an electron with a negative time coordinate but this is physically dubious because it fails in curved spacetimes. Electron-positron pairs are entangled because they are correlated by the process that created the pair. Entanglement is just a correlation, not some magical link.