Preferably the latter, nobody should really be using SHA1 for anything security focused and new

Looks like it’s not all that hard, jsut have to give home assistant some additional permissions to networking at a lower level of the stack

No worries. Depression is a bitch.

Assuming I’m remembering correctly, they’re both very similar. To the point that they’re basically the same concept by different sources and therefore have some wiggle in interpretation

Developing for Lemmy or developing in general?

If you’ve only been developing for 3 years then you’re not much beyond a junior. Nobody (least of all yourself) should expect you to be able to just sit down and grok a rust codebase using actix.

What you appear to be lacking right now is patience and experience. They both come with time.

The hexagonal architecture or onion architecture is oversimplified as having everything bolt onto a core of business logic via designed and designated interfaces to abstract away implementation details on either side.

Say you have a web app which takes requests from the outside world and based on those requests it performs some business logic (tracking accounts, orders, etc).

In hexagonal architecture you’d maybe implement such a thing like:

Web app handler -> command interface -> message bus -> command handler (business logic) -> repository interface -> repository (Postgres, mongo, memory, email)

What this lets you do is split apart the app at the interfaces into separate modules which can be reasoned about and tested separately.

End of the day you don’t care what is happening on the other side of the interface as long as whatever it is follows the interface specification.

Building applications like this meants that if we wanted to extend our app with an API and a Real-time Websocket service, we can (usually) just write a handler to turn that request into a command for the command interface and be done with it.