Good point
Good point
I’m not defending Nazis? I just disagree with the post, which I understood calls for people to dismiss nuance and engage a black and white view. Which smells like populism to me
No you did not follow the Morgentau Plan. Instead you gave Germany a bunch of money to rebuild under the Marshall Plan, and treated us quite kindly to lead us on the right path. (In contrast to the USSR which took revenge by letting their soldiers rape and loot, and disassembled German industries as repayment. The Soviets also tried to forcibly “denazify” Germany which was unsucsessful.)
No, we strangled the ones in charge and then […]
So we agree that there is a difference between Nazis of different caliber, and they’re to be treated differently.
Thank you for your nuanced reply and your openness for semantics discussion.
Provocative question: Do you think then that the US should’ve strangled half the German population instead of just a dozen at the Nuremberg Trials because a Nazi is a Nazi?
Ah yes removing nuance, always a win.
This list is conveniently leaving out the motive of ‘being threatened’, because motives do sometimes matter.
The proper term is “nazi-collaborateur”.
And no I am of course not condoning any violence.
A small loan of 50 billion dollars :D
That doesn’t make sense to me. Trump probably gets money from outside the US too doesn’t he? Also due to US imperialism this election also affects people outside the of US
(On Android five clicks on the lock screen makes an emergency call)
The one morally justifyable cheat day for vegans
Does it heat up evenly?
Privacy Badger seems a bit redundant there
+ buy merch/patreon
You didn’t specify american president, it just added that on it’s own. Training bias I guess
Additionally, USB 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2 labels provide no information on the speed. Rather, “Gen 1” means 5Gb/s, Gen 2 means 10 and Gen 2×2 means 20Gb/s. These “Gen” labels are seldom found on products however.
So for example USB 3.2 Gen 1 is 5Gb/s while USB 3.1 Gen 2 is 10Gb/s
Sounds like predictive T9 but slower
“Our door lock is flawed, but the attacker would need physical access to the key”
Ok I can agree with that
Your comment is very nuanced btw