For what to happen? Your statement is incomplete

If lets say 10% of people vote for the green party. We know that what people want relates to their messaging and they’d try and take voters away from them as it’s easier than taking republicans or people that refuse to vote since you know what the green party stands for. That’s different than voting for the social democrats and so on.

You can’t lump options 3 and 4 together like that.

Not voting sends the message that people are dissatisfied or feel disenfranchised. Now if the Democrats win they won’t care to change. Or even if they nearly win. But if they loose badly they’ll have to cater to these voters. And thus a pivot would be in order. But like we’re both said, not voting harder to take get a party to move in that direction

So as an individual you have 4 options:

1- vote for Biden: democrats maintain the current path as that’s literally what’s happening now

2- vote Trump: either they maintain their current path or democrats have to pivot

3- vote third party: if that party gets enough votes one of the main parties will catwr to the messaging of that party to take those voters in the next cycle as it’s an easy win

4- don’t vote: if enough people don’t vote they’ll cater more to them next cycle but that’s harder to aim in the direction you’d want to promote.

Is that a good enough breakdown? So if I were to rank my options I’d go for 3,4,2,1

It’s not within his powers to do so. But he could have the secret service assassinate them. Pardon the perpetrators and then assign whomever he wants the position with threats against the lives of the senate and congress as a whole for all who would vote against assigning this person. Elimate them and have the vote.

Eating the shit sandwich will result in always getting a shit sandwich

They had 4 years to light l find and line someone else up. Biden’s age isn’t a surprise that snuck up on anyone

Now put in a law saying you can’t do that

For uploading game clips I’d assume

I completely agree that’s what I meant by the 3rd party. Those who will refuse to vote for either and I tend to find that more common from those who would’ve voted Democrat compared to the ones that would’ve voted Republican

For us to do so yes. For the government, it constantly breaks the law

Funny-ly enough you can block their signal. Issue is it’s also going to block everyone within range

You’re forgetting a decent subset. Ones who are informed but would rather vote 3rd party, which due to not having Teddy Roosevelt won’t do shit, rather than vote for either of these guys

I understand for the life of the company. But it’s not even my steam account. It’s my child’s who’s currently -5 years old (give or take). I did create it on their behalf a decade ago to redeem the free games on their behalf and gift them games I think they’ll enjoy.

Oh I didn’t own my steam account it was created for my future children. it’s a trust.

The ad design could link to the products and out of Netflix. So they wouldn’t get clicks

Idk I didn’t have expertise in this space

Took me a minute to figure out why these 2 updates would be bundled together. Must be cause if you downloaded something you’d be able to bypass their ads

Power in the US is held within an oligarchy and when they are threatened people get disappeared. There’s examples of that but one that’s being made an example of in broad daylight is Julian Assange

I understand that. But building chargers using their ports is an option and will be something that happens. It just answers the customers of other OEMs of whether to charge their cars now. And even if Tesla controls a significant portion of the charging infrastructure now there’ll be others that build chargers with that standard with time. And I’m sure there was some closed door agreement they came up with on pricing

It’s a headstart for a robust charging network while other charging station companies build more to catch up

How many ccs chargers are there compared to nas? That’s the question that matters to GM Ford and other automakers