Generalizations aren’t productive
Generalizations aren’t productive
Only if it increased by a very large margin like a DDoS attack
For a good laugh and/or headache check out Google’s history of “wallet” offerings listed on Wikipedia
This is the same guy who started a remote company then tried to pull a “return to office” move on his employees without much notice. I highly doubt they could build their own OS given their poor management record
The sell is a screenless phone with an AI assistant
That’s exactly right. Even if we made an AI that could give us the perfect solution and had accurate projections to back up its assertions, inevitably we’d reject it because we wouldn’t trust it fully. It cannot fix the often selfish nature of humans
There was a 2018 Netflix special as well
Choosing Michael Ian Black for this is… a choice. Seems like he’s been losing fans left and right over the years with his aggressive political brigades on Twitter
JerryRigEverything said is his recent teardown review that Pixel repairability has gotten particularly worse on the 9. Sounded like the battery was very difficult to remove
For reference, Illinois is the place Missouri folks can go for proper treatment (including abortion access). It can be a 4-5 hour drive from the west side of the state though
^~ bat signal for Lina Khan ~^
Honestly can’t believe Google was so explicit in calling RCS an “open standard” and then turning around and doing this
ABC isn’t perceived as a partisan network, is it?
In that video it sure sounds like he says “I love you Christians, I’m not Christian”
Well, sure, but I’m sure most coal miners don’t feel super great about their specific job and profession generally. It’s a waste of resources and capital generally, not at a zoomed in level
I don’t think anyone cares if the VP is “too old” honestly. Most of the time it feels like the VP does things in the background and makes far less headlines. Case in point: Kamala Harris
That’s how culture and news works generally. There’s no stopping it really
Maybe this will save someone a click. Here’s the original source and here’s the full breakdown…
Honestly the 77% of independents strikes me as more important.
Intentions aside, it’s just some independent research that anyone can review and critique. If the research is bad then it should be pointed out and won’t be taken seriously, undermining any influence from Goldman Sachs now and in the future
Seems AI generated and very basic. Barely a game