• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle













  • Right. Many are hitting with the “it should have been handled in private” line, and it’s kind of annoying. Journalists report on things, and GN did just that. Reported on an issue that has been gaining in public discussion over time. This deserved transparency, and I hope that having it put out there will help LMG/LTT fix their shit. I’m sure I can speak for most of us in saying that we WANT LMG/LTT to SUCCEED. We want to see them produce quality content. But they can’t do that with accurate information right now, despite their public desire to provide that.


  • LTT: says they want more accuracy, so they build a whole fucking lab for it.

    Also LTT: puts bad data into the video anyway because time

    That’s literally enough said. It’s not an attack on LMG, it’s pointing out legitimate concerns about LMGs internal processes because these easy to catch errors are getting through all the time.

    They test a water block prototype on a card it wasn’t designed for, and then review it as a finished product with the bad data.

    It’s a pattern over a long period of time that has been called out by the community. GN is fully right to be putting this out there. Even if you disagree with Steve’s assessment, he’s right to be pointing out things he has concerns with.


  • This is only during an update to the community, correct? As in, changing some community setting?

    If that’s the case, it is ensuring that the languages selected for the community are a subset of the site languages and not some arbitrary value. Which is necessary for ensuring that funny business has not been done to the community settings via some raw call or request manipulation.

    If it’s only doing this on community edits, then the performance hit is worth it since it shouldn’t be done very frequently in the normal course of use.

    Try profiling the time it takes to complete the update request and see if it is actually as bad as you think.

    Another option would be to check the languages provided to see if they have been changed, and only do the subset check if they have. That’s really the only time it matters to make that check.