This is about Apple helping build tools for policing. Not about giving over its customers data to police.

We got some good reds and greens tonight in Wisconsin!

Nah that’s what they’re saying. That people used to say that and they were proved wrong.

That’s interesting. Do you know which states haven’t yet joined/would be the most likely to flip to get to the total?

Yea you’re right. I just thought it was funny that a majority of Americans disprove of something that prevents a majority of Americans from being able to choose something

That’s great but do an electoral college majority want to end the electoral college?

I’m a developer at the biggest one of these systems in America. It is stupid expensive. But we support full electronic patient communication. And most of our competitors do too. I’m sorry you’re stuck with one of the few who doesn’t have that option or are choosing not to use it.

Hopefully they come around in the next decade!

FHIR baby!

Interesting I’ll check that out!

Sounds simple and effective, I’ll try that out on one of my test keys. Thanks

Apparently they’d have to go out of their way to support it (Bluetooth has to be configured and enabled) so it will not be implemented

Both sides have pretty bad disinformation going on. Left is just more polished about it, I’m guessing because their demographic is on average much more educated. Right wing stuff you can at least immediately see right through.

Israel coverage from the main stream left has been stunning

From reading other stuff it seems much more likely that its a nuclear powered satellite jammer, not a nuclear satellite weapon. Nuclear powered would allow it to more effectively jam for longer distances/periods of time. We all have nuclear powered satellites in orbit which breaks no nuclear treaties so it sounds like they’re being intentionally vague for some russia fearmongering.

Not to say it’s not bad tho - it could take out commercial satellites like starlink very effectively and we know how critical that’s been for Ukraine/would be for Taiwan

Respectfully disagree. Unchecked this gives whoever has the loudest microphone power to claim whatever they want out of context and most people will never find out the truth until it doesn’t matter anymore.

“This person said something really bad - we can’t tell you what it was but believe us, it was really bad”

The tweet posted is not a good message to spread. But my gauge is whether I’d be ok with the other side having the ability to determine what is and isn’t ok to spread, and I would very much not like Republicans (via legislative or social pressure) to have the ability to dictate what messages are too dangerous to share